Agentic
Not comparable- MiMo-V2.5
- 51.1
- Estimated · #58/151
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 6 vs 1 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 100B
Updated September 4, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
Decision reading
MiMo-V2.5 has the higher public score estimate, 60.72 versus 49.65, but the 90% score intervals overlap. Treat that as a lead, not a settled winner.
1 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Share or export
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
No workload recommendation clears the current evidence threshold.
Use the matched evidence, workload costs, and sourced specifications below instead of treating a point score as a universal answer.
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
Nemotron 3 Super 100B is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
Nemotron 3 Super 100B is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.
Confidence: limited
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
No clear pick
The documented context windows are equal.
Confidence: documented
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
14 MiMo-V2.5 only
1 Shared
- Shared results
- 1
- MiMo-V2.5 only
- 14
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
Coding
Not comparable- MiMo-V2.5
- 54.8
- Estimated · #45/183
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 4 vs 0 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- MiMo-V2.5
- Not ranked
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- MiMo-V2.5
- 53.8
- Estimated · #65/181
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 2 vs 0 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- MiMo-V2.5
- Not ranked
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- MiMo-V2.5
- Not ranked
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- MiMo-V2.5
- 58.5
- #29/48
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 2 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- MiMo-V2.5
- Not ranked
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | MiMo-V2.5 | Nemotron 3 Super 100B | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 51.1Estimated · #58/151 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 6 vs 1 public rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | 54.8Estimated · #45/183 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 4 vs 0 public rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | 53.8Estimated · #65/181 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 2 vs 0 public rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | 58.5#29/48 | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 2 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
A shared-evidence shape is not available.
BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- MiMo-V2.5
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5 has no comparable published API token rate. Nemotron 3 Super 100B has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- MiMo-V2.5
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5 has no comparable published API token rate. Nemotron 3 Super 100B has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- MiMo-V2.5
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
- Nemotron 3 Super 100B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
MiMo-V2.5 has no comparable published API token rate. Nemotron 3 Super 100B has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationMiMo-V2.5Nemotron 3 Super 100B
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
MiMo-V2.5
1M
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
1M
API model ID
MiMo-V2.5
Not sourced
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
MiMo-V2.5
No comparable hosted API rate
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
No comparable hosted API rate
Documented inputs
MiMo-V2.5
Not sourced
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
Not sourced
Documented outputs
MiMo-V2.5
Not sourced
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
Not sourced
Provider availability
MiMo-V2.5
Not sourced
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
MiMo-V2.5
Reasoning
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
Non-Reasoning
Weight access
MiMo-V2.5
Proprietary
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
Open Weight
License
MiMo-V2.5
Proprietary
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
Open Weight
Release date
MiMo-V2.5
2026-04-22
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
2026-01-15
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- MiMo-V2.5 has the higher public score estimate, 60.72 versus 49.65, but the 90% score intervals overlap.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Both models list 1M.
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence15 rows
Agentic
Claw-Eval
Shared sourceMiMo-V2.562.3%Nemotron 3 Super 100B5.5%MiMo-V2.5 leads this result
MM-ClawBench
MiMo-V2.523.8%SourceNemotron 3 Super 100B—Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0
MiMo-V2.565.8%SourceNemotron 3 Super 100B—Not directly comparable
Gert Labs
MiMo-V2.546.89%SourceNemotron 3 Super 100B—Not directly comparable
ResearchClawBench
MiMo-V2.516.9%SourceNemotron 3 Super 100B—Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)
MiMo-V2.560.7%SourceNemotron 3 Super 100B—Not directly comparable
Coding
SWE-bench Pro
MiMo-V2.556.1%SourceNemotron 3 Super 100B—Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0
MiMo-V2.565.8%SourceNemotron 3 Super 100B—Not directly comparable
LiveCodeBench (Vals)
MiMo-V2.581.5%SourceNemotron 3 Super 100B—Not directly comparable
SWE-bench (Vals)
MiMo-V2.571.0%SourceNemotron 3 Super 100B—Not directly comparable
Knowledge
Multimodal
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, MiMo-V2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super 100B?
MiMo-V2.5 has the higher public score estimate, 60.72 versus 49.65, but the 90% score intervals overlap. The higher estimate is not a decisive winner because the uncertainty ranges overlap.
Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super 100B?
Nemotron 3 Super 100B is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Which is better for agentic tasks, MiMo-V2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super 100B?
Nemotron 3 Super 100B is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.
Which costs less, MiMo-V2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super 100B?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, MiMo-V2.5 or Nemotron 3 Super 100B?
Both models list the same context window, 1M.
Related comparisons
Last updated September 4, 2026
Watch MiMo-V2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 100B
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.