Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
MiMo-V2.5
70
Ornith-1.0-35B
67
Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ornith-1.0-35B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+1.6 difference
MiMo-V2.5
Ornith-1.0-35B
$null / $null
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
262K
Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ornith-1.0-35B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
MiMo-V2.5 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 70 versus 67. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
MiMo-V2.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.8 against 64.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 65.8% to 64.2%.
MiMo-V2.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Ornith-1.0-35B.
MiMo-V2.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 70 to 67. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 65.8% and 64.2%.
MiMo-V2.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.8 versus 64.2. Inside this category, Claw-Eval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.