Skip to main content

Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs Sarvam 105B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Xiaomi
58.62/100
Margin
15.6pts
← winning
42.97/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated); Sarvam 105B #157 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. MiMo-V2.5 and Sarvam 105B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to MiMo-V2.5; 11 to Sarvam 105B.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
MiMo-V2.5 only
11
Sarvam 105B only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for MiMo-V2.5 and Sarvam 105B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Sarvam 105B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMiMo-V2.5Sarvam 105BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMiMo-V2.5Not availableSarvam 105B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMiMo-V2.5Not availableSarvam 105BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMiMo-V2.5Not availableSarvam 105BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMiMo-V2.51MSarvam 105B128KMiMo-V2.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Sarvam 105BResult
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 16.9%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 46.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Sarvam 105BResult
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 26.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Sarvam 105BResult
AA-LCRSource 0.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Sarvam 105BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.9%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 73.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 10.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -59.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 93.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Sarvam 105BResult
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 77.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1291Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Sarvam 105BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 34.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare MiMo-V2.5 and Sarvam 105B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for MiMo-V2.5 and Sarvam 105B today?

MiMo-V2.5: Pricing unavailable Sarvam 105B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.