Skip to main content

Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs Trinity-Large-Preview

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Xiaomi
58.62/100
Margin
2.7pts
← winning
55.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated); Trinity-Large-Preview #79 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. MiMo-V2.5 and Trinity-Large-Preview share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to MiMo-V2.5; 17 to Trinity-Large-Preview.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
1
MiMo-V2.5 only
10
Trinity-Large-Preview only
17
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for MiMo-V2.5 and Trinity-Large-Preview is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 512K for Trinity-Large-Preview.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for MiMo-V2.5 and Trinity-Large-Preview
CategoryMiMo-V2.5ΔTrinity-Large-Preview
AgenticMiMo-V2.565.8MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured
CodingMiMo-V2.556.1MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured
MultimodalMiMo-V2.579.0MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMiMo-V2.5Trinity-Large-PreviewComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMiMo-V2.5Not availableTrinity-Large-Preview$0.25 input / $1 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMiMo-V2.5Not availableTrinity-Large-PreviewNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMiMo-V2.5Not availableTrinity-Large-PreviewNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMiMo-V2.51MTrinity-Large-Preview512KMiMo-V2.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 16.9%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 90.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 2.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 554Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 36.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-LCRSource 33.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
MMLUSource 87.2%Not comparable
MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source 75.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 63.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 24.5%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 75.2%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 14.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -44.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 86.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AIME25 (Arcee)Source 24.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 77.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12911165MiMo-V2.5 leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-IFBenchSource 56.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare MiMo-V2.5 and Trinity-Large-Preview on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for MiMo-V2.5 and Trinity-Large-Preview today?

MiMo-V2.5: Pricing unavailable Trinity-Large-Preview: $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.