Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
MiMo-V2-Flash
59
MiniMax M3
76
Verified leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2-Flash unranked · MiniMax M3 #12
Pick MiniMax M3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Coding
+6.4 difference
MiMo-V2-Flash
MiniMax M3
$0 / $0
$0.3 / $1.2
129 t/s
N/A
2.14s
N/A
256K
1M
Pick MiniMax M3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
MiniMax M3 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 76 to 59. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiniMax M3 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for MiMo-V2-Flash. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. MiMo-V2-Flash is the reasoning model in the pair, while MiniMax M3 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. MiniMax M3 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MiMo-V2-Flash.
MiniMax M3 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 76 to 59. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 73.4% and 80.5%.
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.4 versus 67. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.