Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
MiMo-V2-Flash
61
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
56
Pick MiMo-V2-Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Coding
+19.9 difference
Knowledge
+9.0 difference
Math
+12.0 difference
MiMo-V2-Flash
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
129 t/s
N/A
2.14s
N/A
256K
256K
Pick MiMo-V2-Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
MiMo-V2-Flash is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 61 to 56. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2-Flash's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 73.4 against 53.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2025, 94.1% to 82.1%.
MiMo-V2-Flash is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 61 to 56. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2025, where the scores are 94.1% and 82.1%.
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.5 versus 75.5. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.4 versus 53.5. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 94.1 versus 82.1. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.