Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 19 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2-Flash unranked; Nemotron 3 Ultra #24
BenchAlign evidence: MiMo-V2-Flash supported; Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2-Flash and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 19 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to MiMo-V2-Flash; 20 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 19
- MiMo-V2-Flash only
- 1
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 20
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Flash only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 19 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Nemotron 3 Ultra has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 60 versus 57. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Nemotron 3 Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MiMo-V2-Flash.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2-Flash | Δ | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | MiMo-V2-Flash84.7 | Margin← 30.5 | Nemotron 3 Ultra54.2 |
| Coding | MiMo-V2-Flash73.4 | Margin← 15.1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3 |
| Agentic | MiMo-V2-FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3 |
| Reasoning | MiMo-V2-FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9 |
| Multilingual | MiMo-V2-FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra83.0 |
| Inst. Following | MiMo-V2-FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 83.7%B 87%Winner: Nemotron 3 UltraΔ 3.3GPQA: MiMo-V2-Flash scored 83.7%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 87%. Nemotron 3 Ultra wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
MMLU-Pro
KnowledgeA 84.9%B 86.8%Winner: Nemotron 3 UltraΔ 1.9MMLU-Pro: MiMo-V2-Flash scored 84.9%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 86.8%. Nemotron 3 Ultra wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 73.4%B 71.9%Winner: MiMo-V2-FlashΔ 1.5SWE-bench Verified: MiMo-V2-Flash scored 73.4%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 71.9%. MiMo-V2-Flash wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2-Flash$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 output | Listed prices are equal. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2-Flash129 tok/s | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2-Flash2.14 s | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2-Flash256K | Nemotron 3 Ultra1M | Nemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 12.0% | 27.4% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 83.9% | 83.3% | MiMo-V2-Flash leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 16.7% | 33.2% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 833 | 1164 | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| PinchBenchSource | — | 90.0% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 44.4% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 70.9% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 37.4% | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 870 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 28.9% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 3.3% | Not comparable |
CodingMiMo-V2-Flash wins8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 73.4% | 71.9% | MiMo-V2-Flash leads |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 49.8% | 49.3% | MiMo-V2-Flash leads |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 25.8% | 36.4% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 25.9% | 39.9% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 67.7% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | — | 89.0% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 44.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
KnowledgeMiMo-V2-Flash wins12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 83.7% | 87% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| MMLU-ProSource | 84.9% | 86.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 24.7% | 37.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 65.6% | 86.7% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-HLESource | 8.0% | 26.6% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -48.5% | -0.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 15.2% | 21.6% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 75.1% | 28.5% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | 94.1% | — | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | — | 83% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1132 | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, MiMo-V2-Flash or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Nemotron 3 Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 60 to 57. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 83.7% and 87%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, MiMo-V2-Flash or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.7 versus 54.2. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2-Flash or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.4 versus 58.3. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.