Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs o1
Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2-Flash #91 (Supported); o1 #129 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2-Flash and o1 share 13 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 6 results are unique to MiMo-V2-Flash; 3 to o1.
Updated July 24, 2026- Shared results
- 13
- MiMo-V2-Flash only
- 6
- o1 only
- 3
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick MiMo-V2-Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiMo-V2-Flash is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 54.06 to 48.1. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2-Flash's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 84.7 against 75.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 83.7% to 75.7%.
o1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $15.00 input / $60.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for MiMo-V2-Flash. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. MiMo-V2-Flash gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for o1.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2-Flash | Δ | o1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | MiMo-V2-Flash84.7 | Margin← 9.0 | o175.7 |
| Coding | MiMo-V2-Flash73.4 | MarginNo overlap | o1Not measured |
| Math | MiMo-V2-FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | o19.3 |
| Inst. Following | MiMo-V2-FlashNot measured | MarginNo overlap | o192.2 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 83.7%B 75.7%Winner: MiMo-V2-FlashΔ 8GPQA: MiMo-V2-Flash scored 83.7%; o1 scored 75.7%. MiMo-V2-Flash wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2-Flash$0 input / $0 output | o1$15 input / $60 output | MiMo-V2-Flash has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2-Flash129 tok/s | o198 tok/s | MiMo-V2-Flash has the higher measured throughput. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2-Flash2.14 s | o132.29 s | MiMo-V2-Flash reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2-Flash256K | o1200K | MiMo-V2-Flash lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
KnowledgeMiMo-V2-Flash wins9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | o1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 83.7% | 75.7% | MiMo-V2-Flash leads |
| MMLU-ProSource | 84.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 24.7% | 23.4% | MiMo-V2-Flash leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 65.6% | 74.7% | o1 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 8.0% | 7.7% | MiMo-V2-Flash leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -48.5% | -10.5% | o1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 15.2% | 34.7% | o1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 75.1% | 69.3% | o1 leads |
| MMLUSource | — | 91.8% | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, MiMo-V2-Flash or o1?
MiMo-V2-Flash is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 54.06 to 48.1. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 83.7% and 75.7%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, MiMo-V2-Flash or o1?
MiMo-V2-Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.7 versus 75.7. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.