Skip to main content

MiMo-V2-Omni vs Sakana Fugu Ultra

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

MiMo-V2-Omni

82

VS

Sakana Fugu Ultra

100

0 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Omni only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Breakdown

Coding

Sakana Fugu Ultra
74.8vs83.5

+8.7 difference

Operational Comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni

Sakana Fugu Ultra

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$5 / $30

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

262K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Omni only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Sakana Fugu Ultra is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 100 to 82. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Sakana Fugu Ultra's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 83.5 against 74.8.

Sakana Fugu Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for MiMo-V2-Omni.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, MiMo-V2-Omni or Sakana Fugu Ultra?

Sakana Fugu Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 100 to 82.

Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2-Omni or Sakana Fugu Ultra?

Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 83.5 versus 74.8. MiMo-V2-Omni stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 29, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.