Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

MiniCPM5-1B vs Step 3.7 Flash

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
50.87/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: MiniCPM5-1B unranked (Not scored); Step 3.7 Flash #110 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. MiniCPM5-1B and Step 3.7 Flash share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 14 results are unique to MiniCPM5-1B; 29 to Step 3.7 Flash.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
MiniCPM5-1B only
14
Step 3.7 Flash only
29
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for MiniCPM5-1B and Step 3.7 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Step 3.7 Flash has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 131K for MiniCPM5-1B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMiniCPM5-1BStep 3.7 FlashComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMiniCPM5-1BNot availableStep 3.7 Flash$0.2 input / $1.15 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMiniCPM5-1BNot availableStep 3.7 FlashNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMiniCPM5-1BNot availableStep 3.7 FlashNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMiniCPM5-1B131KStep 3.7 Flash256KStep 3.7 Flash lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BStep 3.7 FlashResult
BFCL v4Source 25.1%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —59.5%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource —75.8%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource —92.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —25.9%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource —49.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —67.1%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource —47.2%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource —51.57%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —21.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —98.5%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —1017Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource —14.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BStep 3.7 FlashResult
LiveCodeBench ProSource 22.7%—Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 33.5%—Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —56.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —59.5%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —39.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —40.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BStep 3.7 FlashResult
BBHSource 71.9%—Not comparable
AA-LCRSource —63.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource —2.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BStep 3.7 FlashResult
MMLU-ProSource 48.9%—Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource 70.1%—Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 26.3%—Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 23.1%—Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —30.3%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —80.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —19.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —-37.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —25.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —84.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BStep 3.7 FlashResult
AIME 2025Source 40.4%—Not comparable
AIME26Source 40.4%—Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 25.8%—Not comparable
MATH-500Source 91.6%—Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BStep 3.7 FlashResult
SimpleVQASource —79.2%Not comparable
V*Source —95.3%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource —75.3%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1211Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BStep 3.7 FlashResult
IFBenchSource 46.7%—Not comparable
IFEvalSource 80.4%—Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource —67.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare MiniCPM5-1B and Step 3.7 Flash on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for MiniCPM5-1B and Step 3.7 Flash today?

Step 3.7 Flash: $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

OpenBMB Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.