Model comparison
MiniMax M2.5 vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: MiniMax M2.5 #60 (Supported); Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1 unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiniMax M2.5 and Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to MiniMax M2.5; 0 to Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1.
Updated July 24, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- MiniMax M2.5 only
- 1
- Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1 only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for MiniMax M2.5 and Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1 is priced at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens for MiniMax M2.5. Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for MiniMax M2.5.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiniMax M2.5 | Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiniMax M2.5$0.3 input / $1.2 output | Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1$5 input / $30 output | MiniMax M2.5 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiniMax M2.546 tok/s | Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiniMax M2.52.12 s | Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiniMax M2.5128K | Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.11M | Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.5 | Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vibe Code BenchSource | 14.85% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare MiniMax M2.5 and Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for MiniMax M2.5 and Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1 today?
MiniMax M2.5: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Sakana Fugu-Ultra v1.1: $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.