Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) finishes one point ahead overall, 60 to 59. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)'s sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 71.5 against 60.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 71 to 55. Nemotron 3 Super 100B does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) is the reasoning model in the pair, while Nemotron 3 Super 100B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Nemotron 3 Super 100B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning).
Pick Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Super 100B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
58.5
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
56.6
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
35
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
41.3
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
71.5
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
60.4
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
69.2
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
69.5
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
52.1
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
52.8
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
81
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
84
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
77.8
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
79.5
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)
75.2
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
72.6
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) is ahead overall, 60 to 59. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 71 and 55.
Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 52.8 versus 52.1. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 41.3 versus 35. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 75.2 versus 72.6. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 69.5 versus 69.2. Inside this category, MuSR is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 58.5 versus 56.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.5 versus 60.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 84 versus 81. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.5 versus 77.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.