Skip to main content

Model comparison

Mistral Large 2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 100B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
41.77/100
Margin
8.3pts
winning →
50.08/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Mistral Large 2 #163 (Estimated); Nemotron 3 Super 100B #117 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Mistral Large 2 and Nemotron 3 Super 100B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to Mistral Large 2; 1 to Nemotron 3 Super 100B.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Mistral Large 2 only
11
Nemotron 3 Super 100B only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Mistral Large 2 and Nemotron 3 Super 100B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mistral Large 2.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMistral Large 2Nemotron 3 Super 100BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMistral Large 2Not availableNemotron 3 Super 100B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMistral Large 238 tok/sNemotron 3 Super 100B367 tok/sNemotron 3 Super 100B has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMistral Large 21.45 sNemotron 3 Super 100B0.71 sNemotron 3 Super 100B reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMistral Large 2128KNemotron 3 Super 100B1MNemotron 3 Super 100B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMistral Large 2Nemotron 3 Super 100BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 30.7%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 5.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMistral Large 2Nemotron 3 Super 100BResult
AA-SciCodeSource 29.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMistral Large 2Nemotron 3 Super 100BResult
AA-LCRSource 5.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkMistral Large 2Nemotron 3 Super 100BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.2%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -34.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 20.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 67.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMistral Large 2Nemotron 3 Super 100BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 31.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Mistral Large 2 and Nemotron 3 Super 100B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Mistral Large 2 and Nemotron 3 Super 100B today?

Mistral Large 2: Pricing unavailable Nemotron 3 Super 100B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.