Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs Fugu Cyber
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Fugu Cyber share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 25 results are unique to Mistral Medium 3.5 128B; 2 to Fugu Cyber.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Mistral Medium 3.5 128B only
- 25
- Fugu Cyber only
- 2
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Fugu Cyber is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Fugu Cyber is priced at $6.00 input / $36.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens for Mistral Medium 3.5 128B. Fugu Cyber has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Mistral Medium 3.5 128B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | Fugu Cyber | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B$1.5 input / $7.5 output | Fugu Cyber$6 input / $36 output | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Mistral Medium 3.5 128BNot available | Fugu CyberNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Mistral Medium 3.5 128BNot available | Fugu CyberNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B256K | Fugu Cyber1M | Fugu Cyber lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | Fugu Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ³-bench resultsSource | 91.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 19.0% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 94.2% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 21.4% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 929 | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 39.10% | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 506 | — | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | 33.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 69.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 14.4% | — | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | 33.3% | — | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | — | 86.9% | Not comparable |
| CTI-REALMSource | — | 72.1% | Not comparable |
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | Fugu Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 29.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 74.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 12.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -36.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 25.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 82.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | 33.3% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | Fugu Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 64.9% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | Fugu Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 68.8% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Fugu Cyber on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Fugu Cyber today?
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: $1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens Fugu Cyber: $6.00 input / $36.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.