Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000) is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Confidence: limited
Mistral Small 4 vs Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
Updated October 1, 2026. We do not rank this pair: at least one has no public score. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty.
Both of these models will change. Get the price, version and retirement notices for the pair, each with its source. Follow model changes
Share or export
Decision reading
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. Use the documented cost, context, and runtime rows instead. 0 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Model B
Surogate
—
Evidence status unavailable
90% interval unavailable
- Shared results
- 0
- Mistral Small 4 only
- 0
- Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000) only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
Estimated: Mistral Small 4. Conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.How the comparison works
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
No workload recommendation clears the current evidence threshold.
Use the matched evidence, workload costs, and sourced specifications below instead of treating a point score as a universal answer.
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000) is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.
Confidence: limitedLong documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Not enough matched evidence
A complete context comparison is not sourced.
Confidence: limitedChat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-ratesCache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: rate-fallbackRepository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Which one for a specific job
Choose a job from the LLM Selector's task catalog to see the category row it rests on, under the same basis rules as the table below. A directional row stays directional; choosing a job never creates a winner.
The same task catalog as the LLM Selector. Each job names the evidence surface it rests on; nothing here adds a new score.
21.4Mistral Small 4—Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
Not comparable · BenchAlign v5.8
The coding row is not comparable on the public lane: at least one model is not measured or not ranked there.
Coding scores combine specific tasks and setups. Match the editor, harness, and effort to your workflow.
Same basis rules as the category table below
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
1 Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000) only
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
A shared-evidence shape is not available.
BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign v5.8 lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
Agentic
Not comparable- Mistral Small 4
- 13.3
- Estimated · #107/119
- Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 0 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Coding
Not comparable- Mistral Small 4
- 21.4
- Estimated · #117/144
- Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 0 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Mistral Small 4
- 56.4
- Unranked · 2 rankable rows
- Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Mistral Small 4
- 44.8
- Unranked · 1 rankable row
- Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- Mistral Small 4
- 32.9
- Estimated · #124/170
- Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 0 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Mistral Small 4
- Not ranked
- Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Mistral Small 4
- 55.7
- #77/124
- Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Mistral Small 4
- Not ranked
- Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Mistral Small 4 | Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000) | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 13.3Estimated · #107/119 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 0 public rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | 21.4Estimated · #117/144 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 0 public rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | 56.4Unranked · 2 rankable rows | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | 44.8Unranked · 1 rankable row | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | 32.9Estimated · #124/170 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 0 public rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | 55.7#77/124 | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign v5.8) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the provisional lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Bars run 0–100Methodology
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Mistral Small 4
- $0.00045
- Fits in one request
- Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
- API rate not published
- Fit state unavailable
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000) has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Mistral Small 4
- $0.0093
- Fits in one request
- Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
- API rate not published
- Fit state unavailable
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000) has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Mistral Small 4
- $0.039
- Fits in one request
- Cached input priced at the published list-input rate
- Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
- API rate not published
- Fit state unavailable
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Mistral Small 4 has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate. Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000) has no comparable published API token rate.
Cached input falls back to the list input rate only where a cached rate is unpublished
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationMistral Small 4Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Mistral Small 4
256K
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
Not sourced
API model ID
Mistral Small 4
Not sourced
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Mistral Small 4
Not published
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
No comparable hosted API rate
Provider pricingDocumented inputs
Mistral Small 4
Not sourced
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Mistral Small 4
Not sourced
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
Not sourced
Provider availability
Mistral Small 4
Not sourced
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Mistral Small 4
Non-Reasoning
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
Non-Reasoning
Weight access
Mistral Small 4
Open Weight
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
Unknown
License
Mistral Small 4
Open Weight
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
Proprietary
Release date
Mistral Small 4
2026-02-20
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
Not sourced
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- A complete documented context comparison is not available.
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Questions
Which is better, Mistral Small 4 or Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)?
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Mistral Small 4 or Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)?
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000) is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Mistral Small 4 or Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)?
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000) is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.
Which costs less, Mistral Small 4 or Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Mistral Small 4 or Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)?
A complete documented context-window comparison is not available.
Self-host vs API cost
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
Mistral Small 4
API / mo$563
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even266M/day
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even—
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence1 rows
Reasoning
JevBench 1.5
Mistral Small 4—Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)66.47SourceNot directly comparable
1 public result · 0 shared
Watch Mistral Small 4 vs Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000)
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.
Last updated October 1, 2026