Skip to main content

Model comparison

Mistral Small 4 vs Trinity-Large-Preview

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

46.23/100
Margin
9.7pts
winning →
55.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Mistral Small 4 #140 (Estimated); Trinity-Large-Preview #79 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Mistral Small 4 and Trinity-Large-Preview share 13 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Mistral Small 4; 5 to Trinity-Large-Preview.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
13
Mistral Small 4 only
3
Trinity-Large-Preview only
5
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Mistral Small 4 and Trinity-Large-Preview is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Trinity-Large-Preview is priced at $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens for Mistral Small 4. Trinity-Large-Preview has the larger context window at 512K, compared with 256K for Mistral Small 4.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMistral Small 4Trinity-Large-PreviewComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMistral Small 4$0.15 input / $0.6 outputTrinity-Large-Preview$0.25 input / $1 outputMistral Small 4 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondMistral Small 4175 tok/sTrinity-Large-PreviewNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMistral Small 40.64 sTrinity-Large-PreviewNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMistral Small 4256KTrinity-Large-Preview512KTrinity-Large-Preview lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 4.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 41.2%90.1%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
GDPval-AASource 4.4%2.7%Mistral Small 4 leads
GDPval-AASource 588554Mistral Small 4 leads
Coding
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA Coding IndexSource 26.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.0%36.1%Mistral Small 4 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-LCRSource 44.7%33.0%Mistral Small 4 leads
CritPtSource 0.3%0.9%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.6%24.5%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 76.9%75.2%Mistral Small 4 leads
AA-HLESource 9.5%14.7%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -29.9%-44.2%Mistral Small 4 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.1%22.8%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.8%86.6%Mistral Small 4 leads
MMLUSource 87.2%Not comparable
MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source 75.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 63.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AIME25 (Arcee)Source 24.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 56.8%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1165Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Trinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-IFBenchSource 48.2%56.3%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Mistral Small 4 and Trinity-Large-Preview on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Mistral Small 4 and Trinity-Large-Preview today?

Mistral Small 4: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Trinity-Large-Preview: $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Mistral Small 4
API / mo$563
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even266M/day
Trinity-Large-Preview
API / mo$938
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.