Skip to main content

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Verdict

Muse Spark 1.1 leads for most workloads.

Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.

Muse Spark 1.1

78

VS

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

51

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1ΔNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Knowledge62.1 14.376.4
Multimodal88.4 12.176.3
Coding61.5 6.754.8
Agentic80.4
Inst. Following74.2

Operational Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Muse Spark 1.1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 78 to 51. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Muse Spark 1.1's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 88.4 against 76.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is CharXiv, 88.4% to 76.3%. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Muse Spark 1.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 78 to 51. The biggest single separator in this matchup is CharXiv, where the scores are 88.4% and 76.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.4 versus 62.1. Muse Spark 1.1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark 1.1 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 61.5 versus 54.8. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 88.4 versus 76.3. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 9, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.