Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.5 397B
Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
Muse Spark 1.1 leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
Muse Spark 1.1
78
Qwen3.5 397B
61
Verified leaderboard positions: Muse Spark 1.1 unranked · Qwen3.5 397B #24
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Δ | Qwen3.5 397B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 80.4 | ← 23.9 | 56.5 |
| Multimodal | 88.4 | ← 8.8 | 79.6 |
| Knowledge | 62.1 | ← 5.2 | 56.9 |
| Coding | 61.5 | ← 1.2 | 60.3 |
| Reasoning | — | — | 63.2 |
| Math | — | — | 90.6 |
| Multilingual | — | — | 84.7 |
| Inst. Following | — | — | 92.6 |
Operational Comparison
Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3.5 397B
N/A
$0.6 / $3.6
N/A
96 t/s
N/A
2.44s
1M
128K
Quick Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Muse Spark 1.1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 78 to 61. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Muse Spark 1.1's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 80.4 against 56.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 62.1% to 28.7%.
Muse Spark 1.1 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Qwen3.5 397B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Muse Spark 1.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (5)
Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5 397B?
Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 78 to 61. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 62.1% and 28.7%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5 397B?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.1 versus 56.9. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5 397B?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 61.5 versus 60.3. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5 397B?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.4 versus 56.5. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5 397B?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 88.4 versus 79.6. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.