Model comparison
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Soofi S 30B-A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Muse Spark 1.1 and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 39 results are unique to Muse Spark 1.1; 8 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.
Updated July 15, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Muse Spark 1.1 only
- 39
- Soofi S 30B-A3B only
- 8
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Soofi S 30B-A3B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Muse Spark 1.1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Muse Spark 1.1's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 62.1 against 49.9.
Muse Spark 1.1 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Soofi S 30B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Muse Spark 1.1Not available | Soofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Muse Spark 1.1Not available | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Muse Spark 1.1Not available | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Muse Spark 1.11M | Soofi S 30B-A3B1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic20 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 80% | — | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | 88.1% | — | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | 75.6% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 80.8% | — | Not comparable |
| WebArena-VerifiedSource | 69% | — | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | 84.9% | — | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | 59.0% | — | Not comparable |
| Finance Agent v2Source | 57.2% | — | Not comparable |
| deepSweSource | 53.3% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | 14.2% | — | Not comparable |
| JobBenchSource | 54.7% | — | Not comparable |
| CybenchSource | 92.9% | — | Not comparable |
| ExploitGymSource | 0.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 37.5% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 43.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1374 | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 863 | — | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | 42.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 8.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 25.2% | — | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
Reasoning5 benchmarks
KnowledgeMuse Spark 1.1 wins13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLESource | 62.1% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 52.2% | — | Not comparable |
| HealthBench ProfessionalSource | 59.3% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 50.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 89.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 45.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 18.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 40.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 38.1% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 43.4% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 43.4% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 51.4% | Not comparable |
| AGIEvalSource | — | 66.9% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8KSource | — | 86.1% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Soofi S 30B-A3B?
Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 45.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Soofi S 30B-A3B?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.1 versus 49.9. Soofi S 30B-A3B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.