Skip to main content

Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Qwen3 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

71.04/100
Margin
22.9pts
← winning
Alibaba
48.16/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Muse Spark #13 (Supported); Qwen3 Max #128 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Muse Spark and Qwen3 Max share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 27 results are unique to Muse Spark; 2 to Qwen3 Max.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
12
Muse Spark only
27
Qwen3 Max only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Muse Spark and Qwen3 Max is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3 Max has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Muse Spark.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Muse Spark and Qwen3 Max
CategoryMuse SparkΔQwen3 Max
AgenticMuse Spark59.0MarginNo overlapQwen3 MaxNot measured
CodingMuse Spark67.8MarginNo overlapQwen3 MaxNot measured
ReasoningMuse Spark42.5MarginNo overlapQwen3 MaxNot measured
KnowledgeMuse Spark50.4MarginNo overlapQwen3 MaxNot measured
MathMuse Spark32.9MarginNo overlapQwen3 MaxNot measured
MultimodalMuse Spark82.5MarginNo overlapQwen3 MaxNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMuse SparkQwen3 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMuse SparkNot availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMuse SparkNot availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMuse SparkNot availableQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMuse Spark262KQwen3 Max1MQwen3 Max lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 MaxResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 59%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 91.5%74.3%Muse Spark leads
DeepSearchQASource 74.8%Not comparable
CyberGymSource 43.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 63.8%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 28.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 32.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1144Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 43.74%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 MaxResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.4%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource 80.0%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 19.67%3.51%Muse Spark leads
AA Coding IndexSource 58.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 51.5%38.3%Muse Spark leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 MaxResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 42.5%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 69.7%46.7%Muse Spark leads
CritPtSource 11.3%0.0%Muse Spark leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 MaxResult
GPQA-DSource 89.5%Not comparable
HLESource 50.4%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 42.8%Not comparable
HealthBench HardSource 42.8%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (Text)Source 52.6%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 43.1%24.0%Muse Spark leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 88.4%76.4%Muse Spark leads
AA-HLESource 39.9%11.1%Muse Spark leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 4.1%-43.1%Muse Spark leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 44.6%24.4%Muse Spark leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 73.2%89.4%Muse Spark leads
Math
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 MaxResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 39.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 14.600%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 MaxResult
CharXivSource 86.4%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 80.4%Not comparable
ERQASource 64.7%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource 71.3%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 84.1%Not comparable
ZeroBenchSource 33.0%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 78.4%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.5%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1148Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 MaxResult
AA-IFBenchSource 75.9%44.1%Muse Spark leads
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare Muse Spark and Qwen3 Max on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.