Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Fugu Cyber
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Muse Spark #13 (Supported); Fugu Cyber unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Muse Spark and Fugu Cyber share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 38 results are unique to Muse Spark; 1 to Fugu Cyber.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Muse Spark only
- 38
- Fugu Cyber only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Muse Spark and Fugu Cyber is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Fugu Cyber has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Muse Spark.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Muse Spark | Δ | Fugu Cyber |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Muse Spark59.0 | MarginNo overlap | Fugu CyberNot measured |
| Coding | Muse Spark67.8 | MarginNo overlap | Fugu CyberNot measured |
| Reasoning | Muse Spark42.5 | MarginNo overlap | Fugu CyberNot measured |
| Knowledge | Muse Spark50.4 | MarginNo overlap | Fugu CyberNot measured |
| Math | Muse Spark32.9 | MarginNo overlap | Fugu CyberNot measured |
| Multimodal | Muse Spark82.5 | MarginNo overlap | Fugu CyberNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Muse Spark | Fugu Cyber | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Muse SparkNot available | Fugu Cyber$6 input / $36 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Muse SparkNot available | Fugu CyberNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Muse SparkNot available | Fugu CyberNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Muse Spark262K | Fugu Cyber1M | Fugu Cyber lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Fugu Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 59% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 91.5% | — | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | 74.8% | — | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | 43.5% | 86.9% | Fugu Cyber leads |
| Claw-EvalSource | 63.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 28.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 32.2% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1144 | — | Not comparable |
| CTI-REALMSource | — | 72.1% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Fugu Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA-DSource | 89.5% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 50.4% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 42.8% | — | Not comparable |
| HealthBench HardSource | 42.8% | — | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (Text)Source | 52.6% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 43.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 88.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 39.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 4.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 44.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 73.2% | — | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Fugu Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| CharXivSource | 86.4% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMU-ProSource | 80.4% | — | Not comparable |
| ERQASource | 64.7% | — | Not comparable |
| SimpleVQASource | 71.3% | — | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | 84.1% | — | Not comparable |
| ZeroBenchSource | 33.0% | — | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (MM)Source | 78.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 80.5% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Fugu Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 75.9% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Muse Spark and Fugu Cyber on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Muse Spark and Fugu Cyber today?
Fugu Cyber: $6.00 input / $36.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.