Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4

Updated October 15, 2026. We do not rank this pair: at least one has no public score. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. This is a same-family comparison, so migration details appear when the source data supports them.

Share or export
Share on XLinkedInAPI/MCP

Decision reading

At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. 18 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Model A
NVIDIA logo

NVIDIA

49.51/100

Estimated · Public rank #97

Conditional range 35.2–63.9

Model B
NVIDIA logo

NVIDIA

—

Evidence status unavailable

90% interval unavailable

Shared results
18
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B only
1
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 only
0
Like-for-like categories
1 / 8
Estimated: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B. Conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.How the comparison works

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

No workload recommendation clears the current evidence threshold.

Use the matched evidence, workload costs, and sourced specifications below instead of treating a point score as a universal answer.

Show secondary and unsupported calls
  • Coding work

    Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks

    Not enough matched evidence

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 are not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.

    Confidence: limited
  • Agentic work

    Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion

    Not enough matched evidence

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.

    Confidence: limited
  • Long documents

    Prompts that approach the documented context limit

    No clear pick

    The documented context windows are equal.

    Confidence: documented
  • Chat turn cost

    1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates
  • Cache-heavy agent loop cost

    200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates
  • Repository review cost

    50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

Which one for a specific job

Choose a job from the LLM Selector's task catalog to see the category row it rests on, under the same basis rules as the table below. A directional row stays directional; choosing a job never creates a winner.

The same task catalog as the LLM Selector. Each job names the evidence surface it rests on; nothing here adds a new score.

—Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B—Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4

Not comparable · BenchAlign v5.8

The coding row is not comparable on the public lane: at least one model is not measured or not ranked there.

Coding scores combine specific tasks and setups. Match the editor, harness, and effort to your workflow.

Same basis rules as the category table below

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.

Bars run 0–100 on each benchmark’s normalized display scale

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign v5.8 lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.

Instruction following

Like-for-like
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
66.6
#72/146
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4
68.1
#71/146
Basis
Provisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 leads

Agentic

Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
44.2
Estimated · #61/127
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4
Not ranked
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 4 vs 4 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Coding

Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
Not ranked
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4
Not ranked
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 4 vs 4 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Reasoning

Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
73.0
Unranked · 2 rankable rows
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4
72.4
Unranked · 1 rankable row
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
62.0
Unranked · 5 rankable rows
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4
59.5
Unranked · 5 rankable rows
Basis
Provisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Knowledge

Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
51.8
Estimated · #73/184
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4
Not ranked
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 3 vs 3 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
Not ranked
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Math

Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
Not ranked
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign v5.8) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the provisional lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.

Bars run 0–100Methodology

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
API rate not published
Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4
API rate not published
Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has no comparable published API token rate. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 has no comparable published API token rate.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
API rate not published
Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4
API rate not published
Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has no comparable published API token rate. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 has no comparable published API token rate.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
API rate not published
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4
API rate not published
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has no comparable published API token rate. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 has no comparable published API token rate.

Cached input falls back to the list input rate only where a cached rate is unpublished

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

API model ID

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B

Not sourced

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4

nvidia/nemotron-3.5-super-vl-120b-a12b

NVIDIA Build NVFP4 endpoint

Cached-input rate

A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B

No comparable hosted API rate

NVIDIA Hugging Face model card

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4

No comparable hosted API rate

NVIDIA Build model listing

Provider availability

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B

Open Weights · Hugging Face, self-hosted inference

NVIDIA BF16 model card

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4

Open Weights · Hugging Face, self-hosted inference, NVIDIA Build early access

NVIDIA NVFP4 model card

Reasoning profile

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B

Reasoning

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4

Reasoning

Weight access

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B

Open Weight

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4

Open Weight

License

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B

Open Weight

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4

Open Weight

Release date

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B

2026-10-15

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4

2026-10-15

If you are choosing between sibling variants

Deployment change
Both entries list NVIDIA as the provider. Confirm endpoint, model ID, limits, and feature support before switching.
Quality signal
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
Workload cost
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Context tradeoff
Both models list 1M.
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Questions

Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4?

At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 are not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.

Which costs less, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4?

Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.

Which has the larger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4?

Both models list the same context window, 1M.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence19 rows

Agentic

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B66.7%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP460.8%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

  • τ²-bench Airline

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B76.5%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP475.8%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

  • τ³-bench results

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B18.9%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP417.8%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

  • BrowseComp

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B78%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP477.5%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

Coding

  • LiveCodeBench v6

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B88.2%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP487.4%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

  • SWE-bench Verified

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B71.1%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP471.1%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

  • SWE Multilingual

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B67.7%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP467%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

  • SWE-bench Pro

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B51.8%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP451.3%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

Reasoning

  • CritPt

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B10.9%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4—

    Not directly comparable

Multimodal

  • BabyVision

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B29.6%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP429.5%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

  • MMLongBench-Doc

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B62.8%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP462.8%
    Source

    Tie

  • V*

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B85.6%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP486.0%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 leads this result

  • MathVision

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B78.2%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP477.8%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

  • CharXiv

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B80.8%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP479.9%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

Knowledge

  • GPQA-D

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B89.5%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP489.9%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 leads this result

  • HLE w/o tools

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B31.8%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP431.4%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

  • HLE

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B29.2%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP429%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result

Instruction following

  • IFBench

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B70.9%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP471.5%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 leads this result

Math

  • Apex Shortlist

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B88.4%
    Source
    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP489.4%
    Source

    Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4 leads this result

19 public results · 18 shared

Watch Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,500+ readers.

Last updated October 15, 2026