Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Updated October 15, 2026. Rank says Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B is ahead. Price, access, and your workload can each overturn that. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty.
Both of these models will change. Get the price, version and retirement notices for the pair, each with its source. Follow model changes
Share or export
Decision reading
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has the higher public point estimate, 49.51 versus 32.31. Their conditional score ranges overlap. These ranges do not establish rank confidence. 4 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Model A
NVIDIA
49.51/100
Estimated · Public rank #97
Conditional range 35.2–63.9
Model B
NVIDIA
32.31/100
Estimated · Public rank #169
Conditional range 18.0–46.7
- Shared results
- 4
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B only
- 15
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- 12
- Like-for-like categories
- 1 / 8
Estimated: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B. Conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.How the comparison works
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Confidence: limitedAgentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.
Confidence: limitedChat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-ratesCache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-ratesRepository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Which one for a specific job
Choose a job from the LLM Selector's task catalog to see the category row it rests on, under the same basis rules as the table below. A directional row stays directional; choosing a job never creates a winner.
The same task catalog as the LLM Selector. Each job names the evidence surface it rests on; nothing here adds a new score.
—Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B15.4Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not comparable · BenchAlign v5.8
The coding row is not comparable on the public lane: at least one model is not measured or not ranked there.
Coding scores combine specific tasks and setups. Match the editor, harness, and effort to your workflow.
Same basis rules as the category table below
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
15 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B only
4 Shared
12 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
1 category rests on Estimated evidence or different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.
CharXivMultimodal
Normalized gap 4.6Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B:80.8%Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B:76.3%IFBenchInstruction following
Normalized gap 3.3Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B:70.9%Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B:74.2%
Bars run 0–100 on each benchmark’s normalized display scale
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign v5.8 lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
Instruction following
Like-for-like- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
- 66.6
- #72/146
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 75.4
- #64/146
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows
- Reading
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads
Knowledge
Directional only- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
- 51.8
- Estimated · #73/184
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 32.7
- Supported · #142/184
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 3 vs 3 public rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Agentic
Not comparable- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
- 44.2
- Estimated · #61/127
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 4 vs 2 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Coding
Not comparable- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
- Not ranked
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 15.4
- Estimated · #133/150
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 4 vs 2 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
- 73.0
- Unranked · 2 rankable rows
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 53.1
- Unranked · 2 rankable rows
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
- 62.0
- Unranked · 5 rankable rows
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 43.8
- #50/54
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
- Not ranked
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
- Not ranked
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction following | 66.6#72/146 | 75.4#64/146 | Like-for-likeProvisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| Knowledge | 51.8Estimated · #73/184 | 32.7Supported · #142/184 | Directional onlyBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 3 vs 3 public rows | Directional only |
| Agentic | 44.2Estimated · #61/127 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 4 vs 2 public rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | Not ranked | 15.4Estimated · #133/150 | Not comparableBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 4 vs 2 public rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | 73.0Unranked · 2 rankable rows | 53.1Unranked · 2 rankable rows | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | 62.0Unranked · 5 rankable rows | 43.8#50/54 | Not comparableProvisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign v5.8) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the provisional lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Supported evidence per lane · bars run 0–100Methodology
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has no comparable published API token rate. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has no comparable published API token rate. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has no comparable published API token rate. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has no comparable published API token rate.
Cached input falls back to the list input rate only where a cached rate is unpublished
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationNemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12BNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
256K
API model ID
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
Not sourced
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
No comparable hosted API rate
NVIDIA Hugging Face model cardNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
No comparable hosted API rate
Documented inputs
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
text, image, video
NVIDIA BF16 model cardNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not sourced
Provider availability
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
Open Weights · Hugging Face, self-hosted inference
NVIDIA BF16 model cardNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
Reasoning
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Reasoning
Weight access
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
Open Weight
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Open Weight
License
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
Open Weight
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Open Weight
Release date
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B
2026-10-15
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
2026-04-28
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- Both entries list NVIDIA as the provider. Confirm endpoint, model ID, limits, and feature support before switching.
- Quality signal
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has the higher public point estimate, 49.51 versus 32.31. Their conditional score ranges overlap. These ranges do not establish rank confidence.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has the larger documented window (1M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Questions
Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has the higher public point estimate, 49.51 versus 32.31. Their conditional score ranges overlap. These ranges do not establish rank confidence. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.
Which costs less, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B has the larger documented context window: 1M, compared with 256K.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence31 rows
Agentic
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B66.7%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
τ²-bench Airline
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B76.5%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
τ³-bench results
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B18.9%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
BrowseComp
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B78%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
OSWorld
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B47.4%SourceNot directly comparable
τ²-bench results
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B45.3%SourceNot directly comparable
Coding
LiveCodeBench v6
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B88.2%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
SWE-bench Verified
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B71.1%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
SWE Multilingual
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B67.7%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
SWE-bench Pro
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B51.8%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
LiveCodeBench v5
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B63.2%SourceNot directly comparable
SciCode
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32%SourceNot directly comparable
Reasoning
CritPt
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B10.9%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
Multimodal
BabyVision
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B29.6%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
MMLongBench-Doc
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B62.8%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B57.5%SourceNemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result
V*
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B85.6%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
MathVision
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B78.2%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
CharXiv
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B80.8%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3%SourceNemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result
MMMU
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B70.8%SourceNot directly comparable
ScreenSpot Pro
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B57.8%SourceNot directly comparable
Video-MME (w/o subtitle)
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B72.2%SourceNot directly comparable
AI2D_TEST
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B88.5%SourceNot directly comparable
RefCOCO (avg)
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B90.5%SourceNot directly comparable
Knowledge
GPQA-D
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B89.5%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B72.2%SourceNemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B leads this result
HLE w/o tools
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B31.8%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
HLE
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B29.2%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
MMLU-Pro
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B77.3%SourceNot directly comparable
GPQA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B72.2%SourceNot directly comparable
Instruction following
Math
31 public results · 4 shared
Watch Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 5,500+ readers.
Last updated October 15, 2026