Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 52 to 39. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B gives you the larger context window at 32K, compared with 16K for Phi-4.
Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Phi-4 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
47.5
Phi-4
70.5
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
30.3
Phi-4
82.6
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
75
Phi-4
80.6
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is ahead overall, 52 to 39. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 49 and 82.6.
Phi-4 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.5 versus 47.5. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Phi-4 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 82.6 versus 30.3. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Phi-4 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.6 versus 75. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.