Skip to main content

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B vs Qwen3.5 397B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

52.94/100
Margin
4.1pts
winning →
57.01/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B #98 (Estimated); Qwen3.5 397B #71 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Qwen3.5 397B share 15 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B; 40 to Qwen3.5 397B.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
15
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B only
0
Qwen3.5 397B only
40
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Qwen3.5 397B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3.5 397B is priced at $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B. Qwen3.5 397B has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Qwen3.5 397B
CategoryNemotron 3 Nano 30BΔQwen3.5 397B
AgenticNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B56.5
CodingNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B66.5
ReasoningNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B63.2
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B56.6
MathNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B90.6
MultilingualNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B84.7
MultimodalNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B79.6
Inst. FollowingNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B92.6

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 Nano 30BQwen3.5 397BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Nano 30B$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.5 397B$0.6 input / $3.6 outputNemotron 3 Nano 30B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 Nano 30B152 tok/sQwen3.5 397B96 tok/sNemotron 3 Nano 30B has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 Nano 30B1.90 sQwen3.5 397B2.44 sNemotron 3 Nano 30B reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Nano 30B32KQwen3.5 397B128KQwen3.5 397B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BQwen3.5 397BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 40.9%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%23.1%Qwen3.5 397B leads
GDPval-AASource 484962Qwen3.5 397B leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 2.0%19.9%Qwen3.5 397B leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 52.5%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 62%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 56.8%Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource 51.8%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 68.4%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource 43.7%Not comparable
DeepPlanningSource 37.6%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 36.3%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 46.1%Not comparable
MCP-TasksSource 74.2%Not comparable
WideResearchSource 74.0%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.76%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 14.2%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 15.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BQwen3.5 397BResult
AA-SciCodeSource 29.6%42.0%Qwen3.5 397B leads
AA Coding IndexSource 14.4%48.2%Qwen3.5 397B leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 76.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 83.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 50.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BQwen3.5 397BResult
AA-LCRSource 33.7%65.7%Qwen3.5 397B leads
CritPtSource 0.9%1.7%Qwen3.5 397B leads
LongBench v2Source 63.2%Not comparable
AI-NeedleSource 68.7%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BQwen3.5 397BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.2%33.7%Qwen3.5 397B leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 75.7%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B leads
AA-HLESource 10.2%27.3%Qwen3.5 397B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -51.6%-29.8%Qwen3.5 397B leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.1%31.4%Qwen3.5 397B leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 82.9%89.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
GPQASource 88.4%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 70.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 87.8%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource 94.9%Not comparable
C-EvalSource 93%Not comparable
HLESource 28.7%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BQwen3.5 397BResult
AIME26Source 93.3%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2025Source 94.8%Not comparable
HMMT Nov 2025Source 92.7%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 87.9%Not comparable
MMAnswerBenchSource 80.9%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BQwen3.5 397BResult
MMLU-ProXSource 84.7%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source 59.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BQwen3.5 397BResult
MMMU-ProSource 79%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 88.6%Not comparable
CharXivSource 80.8%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource 84.7%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 65.6%Not comparable
V*Source 95.8%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 77.3%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BQwen3.5 397BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 71.1%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B leads
IFEvalSource 92.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Qwen3.5 397B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Qwen3.5 397B today?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.5 397B: $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.