Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B #98 (Estimated); Qwen3.7 Plus #21 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Qwen3.7 Plus share 15 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B; 54 to Qwen3.7 Plus.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 15
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B only
- 0
- Qwen3.7 Plus only
- 54
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Qwen3.7 Plus is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 32K for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Δ | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus71.7 |
| Coding | Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus75.6 |
| Reasoning | Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus91.7 |
| Knowledge | Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus60.1 |
| Math | Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus92.9 |
| Multilingual | Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus85.4 |
| Multimodal | Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus81.5 |
| Inst. Following | Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.7 Plus84.5 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B$0 input / $0 output | Qwen3.7 PlusNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B152 tok/s | Qwen3.7 PlusNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B1.90 s | Qwen3.7 PlusNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B32K | Qwen3.7 Plus1M | Qwen3.7 Plus lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic16 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 40.9% | 93% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 0.0% | 21.8% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 484 | 936 | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 2.0% | 20.8% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 70.3% | Not comparable |
| QwenClawBenchSource | — | 61.8% | Not comparable |
| QwenWebBenchSource | — | 1536 | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 62.7% | Not comparable |
| BFCL v4Source | — | 72.9% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 73.2% | Not comparable |
| VITA-BenchSource | — | 45.6% | Not comparable |
| DeepPlanningSource | — | 62.3% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | — | 73.3% | Not comparable |
| AndroidWorldSource | — | 81.0% | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 22.4% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | — | 2.8% | Not comparable |
Coding9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | 29.6% | 45.5% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 14.4% | 55.9% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 70.3% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 77.7% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 57.6% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 75.8% | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | — | 41.1% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 51.3% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBenchSource | — | 89.6% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 14.2% | 39.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 75.7% | 90.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-HLESource | 10.2% | 33.4% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -51.6% | 2.4% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 17.1% | 22.2% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 82.9% | 25.5% | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| GPQASource | — | 90.3% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 90.3% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 34.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 88.5% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ReduxSource | — | 94.5% | Not comparable |
| SuperGPQASource | — | 71.4% | Not comparable |
| MMMLUSource | — | 89.0% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multilingual5 benchmarks
Multimodal17 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-ProSource | — | 79% | Not comparable |
| MathVisionSource | — | 90.3% | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 85.9% | Not comparable |
| ERQASource | — | 69.8% | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (MM)Source | — | 71.0% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 79.0% | Not comparable |
| SimpleVQASource | — | 81.7% | Not comparable |
| MMSearch-PlusSource | — | 41.4% | Not comparable |
| RealWorldQASource | — | 86.9% | Not comparable |
| OmniDocBench 1.5Source | — | 91.4% | Not comparable |
| OCRBench V2Source | — | 70.7% | Not comparable |
| ODINW13Source | — | 51.1% | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (with subtitle)Source | — | 88.0% | Not comparable |
| VideoMMMUSource | — | 85.4% | Not comparable |
| MLVU (M-Avg)Source | — | 87.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 80.5% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1288 | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Qwen3.7 Plus on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Qwen3.7 Plus today?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.