Skip to main content

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B vs Step 3.7 Flash

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

52.68/100
Margin
1.9pts
← winning
50.76/100
0 category wins0 category wins

BenchAlign evidence: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B estimated; Step 3.7 Flash estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Step 3.7 Flash share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B; 14 to Step 3.7 Flash.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
16
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B only
0
Step 3.7 Flash only
14
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Step 3.7 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Step 3.7 Flash is priced at $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B. Step 3.7 Flash has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 32K for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Step 3.7 Flash
CategoryNemotron 3 Nano 30BΔStep 3.7 Flash
AgenticNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measuredMarginNo overlapStep 3.7 Flash66.4
CodingNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measuredMarginNo overlapStep 3.7 Flash56.3

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 Nano 30BStep 3.7 FlashComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Nano 30B$0 input / $0 outputStep 3.7 Flash$0.2 input / $1.15 outputNemotron 3 Nano 30B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 Nano 30B152 tok/sStep 3.7 FlashNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 Nano 30B1.90 sStep 3.7 FlashNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Nano 30B32KStep 3.7 Flash256KStep 3.7 Flash lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BStep 3.7 FlashResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 40.9%98.5%Step 3.7 Flash leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%25.9%Step 3.7 Flash leads
GDPval-AASource 4841017Step 3.7 Flash leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 2.0%21.5%Step 3.7 Flash leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 59.5%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 75.8%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 92.8%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 49.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 67.1%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 47.2%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 51.57%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 14.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BStep 3.7 FlashResult
Terminal-Bench HardSource 13.6%35.6%Step 3.7 Flash leads
AA-SciCodeSource 29.6%40.0%Step 3.7 Flash leads
AA Coding IndexSource 14.4%39.6%Step 3.7 Flash leads
SWE-bench ProSource 56.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 59.5%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BStep 3.7 FlashResult
AA-LCRSource 33.7%63.7%Step 3.7 Flash leads
CritPtSource 0.9%2.3%Step 3.7 Flash leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BStep 3.7 FlashResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.2%30.3%Step 3.7 Flash leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 75.7%80.9%Step 3.7 Flash leads
AA-HLESource 10.2%19.9%Step 3.7 Flash leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -51.6%-37.5%Step 3.7 Flash leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.1%25.4%Step 3.7 Flash leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 82.9%84.4%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BStep 3.7 FlashResult
SimpleVQASource 79.2%Not comparable
V*Source 95.3%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 75.3%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1218Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30BStep 3.7 FlashResult
AA-IFBenchSource 71.1%67.3%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Step 3.7 Flash on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B and Step 3.7 Flash today?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Step 3.7 Flash: $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.