Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 22 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

44.24/100
Margin
23.0pts
winning →
67.22/100
1 category wins3 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #151 (Estimated); Qwen3.7 Plus #21 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.7 Plus share 22 comparable benchmark results. 4 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B; 47 to Qwen3.7 Plus.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
22
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
7
Qwen3.7 Plus only
47
Comparable categories
4 / 8

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 22 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 4 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Qwen3.7 Plus is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 67.22 to 44.24. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.7 Plus's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 75.6 against 32. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SciCode, 32% to 51.3%. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.7 Plus gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.7 Plus
CategoryNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BΔQwen3.7 Plus
CodingNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0Margin→ 43.6Qwen3.7 Plus75.6
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3Margin← 16.2Qwen3.7 Plus60.1
Inst. FollowingNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2Margin→ 10.3Qwen3.7 Plus84.5
MultimodalNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3Margin→ 5.2Qwen3.7 Plus81.5
AgenticNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus71.7
ReasoningNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus91.7
MathNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus92.9
MultilingualNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus85.4

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BB · Qwen3.7 Plus

  1. SciCode

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 32%B 51.3%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 19.3
    SciCode: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 32%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 51.3%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  2. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 72.2%B 90.3%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 18.1
    GPQA: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 72.2%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 90.3%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  3. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 77.3%B 88.5%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 11.2
    MMLU-Pro: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 77.3%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 88.5%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  4. CharXiv

    Multimodal
    Source ↗
    A 76.3%B 85.9%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 9.7
    CharXiv: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 76.3%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 85.9%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  5. IFBench

    Inst. Following
    Source ↗
    A 74.2%B 79.1%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 4.9
    IFBench: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 74.2%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 79.1%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 PlusComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256KQwen3.7 Plus1MQwen3.7 Plus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 PlusResult
OSWorldSource 47.4%—Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 45.3%93%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%21.8%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
GDPval-AASource 467936Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —70.3%Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource —61.8%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1536Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —62.7%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —72.9%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —73.2%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —45.6%Not comparable
DeepPlanningSource —62.3%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource —73.3%Not comparable
AndroidWorldSource —81.0%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —20.8%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource —22.4%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source —2.8%Not comparable
CodingQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 PlusResult
SciCodeSource 32%51.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-SciCodeSource 27.8%45.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA Coding IndexSource 13.8%55.9%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —70.3%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource —77.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —57.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource —75.8%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —41.1%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —89.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 PlusResult
AA-LCRSource 35.7%65.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
CritPtSource 0.0%9.1%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
MRCRv2Source —91.7%Not comparable
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 PlusResult
MMLU-ProSource 77.3%88.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
GPQASource 72.2%90.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
GPQA-DSource 72.2%90.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.9%39.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 46.9%90.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-HLESource 5.3%33.4%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.0%2.4%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 14.8%22.2%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 83.1%25.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
HLESource —34.7%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —94.5%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —71.4%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —89.0%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 PlusResult
AIME 2025Source 82.1%—Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source —92.9%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —86.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —22.7%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 PlusResult
MMLU-ProXSource —85.4%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source —58.8%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —83.0%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —88.8%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —84.0%Not comparable
MultimodalQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 PlusResult
MMMUSource 70.8%—Not comparable
MMLongBench-DocSource 57.5%—Not comparable
CharXivSource 76.3%85.9%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
ScreenSpot ProSource 57.8%79.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source 72.2%—Not comparable
AI2D_TESTSource 88.5%—Not comparable
RefCOCO (avg)Source 90.5%—Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 53.2%80.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
MMMU-ProSource —79%Not comparable
MathVisionSource —90.3%Not comparable
ERQASource —69.8%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source —71.0%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource —81.7%Not comparable
MMSearch-PlusSource —41.4%Not comparable
RealWorldQASource —86.9%Not comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5Source —91.4%Not comparable
OCRBench V2Source —70.7%Not comparable
ODINW13Source —51.1%Not comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source —88.0%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource —85.4%Not comparable
MLVU (M-Avg)Source —87.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1288Not comparable
Inst. FollowingQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 PlusResult
IFBenchSource 74.2%79.1%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-IFBenchSource 63.2%78.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
IFEvalSource —94.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 67.22 to 44.24. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SciCode, where the scores are 32% and 51.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.3 versus 60.1. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 75.6 versus 32. Inside this category, AA Coding Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 76.3. Inside this category, AA-MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 84.5 versus 74.2. Inside this category, AA-IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

NVIDIA Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.