Instruction following
Like-for-like- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 75.9
- #57/120
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 91.1
- #17/120
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows
- Reading
- Qwen3.7 Plus leads
NVIDIA
43.97/100
Estimated · Public rank #172
90% interval 32.5–55.5
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Updated September 4, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
Decision reading
Qwen3.7 Plus has the higher public score estimate, 62.29 versus 43.97, but the 90% score intervals overlap. Treat that as a lead, not a settled winner.
7 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Share or export
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.7 Plus are scored on Estimated evidence for coding, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is scored on Estimated evidence for agentic, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like.
Confidence: limited
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
9 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
7 Shared
45 Qwen3.7 Plus only
- Shared results
- 7
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- 9
- Qwen3.7 Plus only
- 45
- Like-for-like categories
- 1 / 8
4 categories rest on Estimated evidence or different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
Agentic
Directional only- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 47.0
- Estimated · #83/151
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 37.7
- Supported · #126/151
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 2 vs 11 public rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Coding
Directional only- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 42.6
- Estimated · #129/183
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 53.1
- Estimated · #51/183
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 2 vs 7 public rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Knowledge
Directional only- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 39.9
- Supported · #140/181
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 56.8
- Estimated · #50/181
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 3 vs 7 public rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Multimodal
Directional only- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 39.3
- #42/48
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 72.5
- #18/48
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 1 vs 2 weighted rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Reasoning
Not comparable- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 50.3
- Unranked · 2 rankable rows
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 73.7
- Unranked · 3 rankable rows
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 78.3
- Unranked · 3 rankable rows
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 78.9
- #3/12
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction following | 75.9#57/120 | 91.1#17/120 | Like-for-likeProvisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows | Qwen3.7 Plus leads |
| Agentic | 47.0Estimated · #83/151 | 37.7Supported · #126/151 | Directional onlyBenchAlign lane · 2 vs 11 public rows | Directional only |
| Coding | 42.6Estimated · #129/183 | 53.1Estimated · #51/183 | Directional onlyBenchAlign lane · 2 vs 7 public rows | Directional only |
| Knowledge | 39.9Supported · #140/181 | 56.8Estimated · #50/181 | Directional onlyBenchAlign lane · 3 vs 7 public rows | Directional only |
| Multimodal | 39.3#42/48 | 72.5#18/48 | Directional onlyProvisional lane · 1 vs 2 weighted rows | Directional only |
| Reasoning | 50.3Unranked · 2 rankable rows | 73.7Unranked · 3 rankable rows | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not ranked | 78.3Unranked · 3 rankable rows | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | 78.9#3/12 | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.
SciCode
Coding
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B: 32%Qwen3.7 Plus: 51.3%Normalized gap 19.3Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B source Qwen3.7 Plus sourceGPQA
Knowledge
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B: 72.2%Qwen3.7 Plus: 90.3%Normalized gap 18.1Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B source Qwen3.7 Plus sourceMMLU-Pro
Knowledge
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B: 77.3%Qwen3.7 Plus: 88.5%Normalized gap 11.2Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B source Qwen3.7 Plus sourceCharXiv
Multimodal
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B: 76.3%Qwen3.7 Plus: 85.9%Normalized gap 9.7Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B source Qwen3.7 Plus sourceIFBench
Instruction following
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B: 74.2%Qwen3.7 Plus: 79.1%Normalized gap 4.9Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B source Qwen3.7 Plus source
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.7 Plus has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.7 Plus has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.7 Plus has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 Plus
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
256K
Qwen3.7 Plus
1M
API model ID
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not sourced
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
No comparable hosted API rate
Qwen3.7 Plus
No comparable hosted API rate
Documented inputs
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not sourced
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not sourced
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not sourced
Provider availability
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not sourced
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Reasoning
Qwen3.7 Plus
Reasoning
Weight access
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Open Weight
Qwen3.7 Plus
Proprietary
License
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Open Weight
Qwen3.7 Plus
Proprietary
Release date
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
2026-04-28
Qwen3.7 Plus
2026-06-03
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- Qwen3.7 Plus has the higher public score estimate, 62.29 versus 43.97, but the 90% score intervals overlap.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger documented window (1M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence61 rows
Agentic
OSWorld
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B47.4%SourceQwen3.7 Plus—Not directly comparable
τ²-bench results
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B45.3%SourceQwen3.7 Plus—Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus70.3%SourceNot directly comparable
QwenClawBench
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus61.8%SourceNot directly comparable
Claw-Eval
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus62.7%SourceNot directly comparable
BFCL v4
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus72.9%SourceNot directly comparable
MCP Atlas
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus73.2%SourceNot directly comparable
VITA-Bench
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus45.6%SourceNot directly comparable
DeepPlanning
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus62.3%SourceNot directly comparable
OSWorld-Verified
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus73.3%SourceNot directly comparable
AndroidWorld
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus81.0%SourceNot directly comparable
OSWorld 2.0
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus2.8%SourceNot directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus52.8%SourceNot directly comparable
Coding
LiveCodeBench v5
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B63.2%SourceQwen3.7 Plus—Not directly comparable
SciCode
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32%SourceQwen3.7 Plus51.3%SourceQwen3.7 Plus leads this result
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus70.3%SourceNot directly comparable
SWE-bench Verified
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus77.7%SourceNot directly comparable
SWE-bench Pro
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus57.6%SourceNot directly comparable
SWE Multilingual
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus75.8%SourceNot directly comparable
NL2Repo
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus41.1%SourceNot directly comparable
LiveCodeBench
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus89.6%SourceNot directly comparable
Reasoning
Knowledge
MMLU-Pro
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B77.3%SourceQwen3.7 Plus88.5%SourceQwen3.7 Plus leads this result
GPQA
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B72.2%SourceQwen3.7 Plus90.3%SourceQwen3.7 Plus leads this result
GPQA-D
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B72.2%SourceQwen3.7 Plus90.3%SourceQwen3.7 Plus leads this result
HLE
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus34.7%SourceNot directly comparable
MMLU-Redux
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus94.5%SourceNot directly comparable
SuperGPQA
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus71.4%SourceNot directly comparable
MMMLU
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus89.0%SourceNot directly comparable
Math
AIME 2025
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B82.1%SourceQwen3.7 Plus—Not directly comparable
HMMT Feb 2026
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus92.9%SourceNot directly comparable
IMOAnswerBench
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus86.0%SourceNot directly comparable
Apex
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus22.7%SourceNot directly comparable
Multilingual
MMLU-ProX
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus85.4%SourceNot directly comparable
NOVA-63
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus58.8%SourceNot directly comparable
INCLUDE
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus83.0%SourceNot directly comparable
MAXIFE
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus88.8%SourceNot directly comparable
PolyMath
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus84.0%SourceNot directly comparable
Multimodal
MMMU
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B70.8%SourceQwen3.7 Plus—Not directly comparable
MMLongBench-Doc
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B57.5%SourceQwen3.7 Plus—Not directly comparable
CharXiv
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3%SourceQwen3.7 Plus85.9%SourceQwen3.7 Plus leads this result
ScreenSpot Pro
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B57.8%SourceQwen3.7 Plus79.0%SourceQwen3.7 Plus leads this result
Video-MME (w/o subtitle)
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B72.2%SourceQwen3.7 Plus—Not directly comparable
AI2D_TEST
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B88.5%SourceQwen3.7 Plus—Not directly comparable
RefCOCO (avg)
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B90.5%SourceQwen3.7 Plus—Not directly comparable
MMMU-Pro
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus79%SourceNot directly comparable
MathVision
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus90.3%SourceNot directly comparable
ERQA
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus69.8%SourceNot directly comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus71.0%SourceNot directly comparable
SimpleVQA
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus81.7%SourceNot directly comparable
MMSearch-Plus
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus41.4%SourceNot directly comparable
RealWorldQA
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus86.9%SourceNot directly comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus91.4%SourceNot directly comparable
OCRBench V2
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus70.7%SourceNot directly comparable
ODINW13
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus51.1%SourceNot directly comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus88.0%SourceNot directly comparable
VideoMMMU
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus85.4%SourceNot directly comparable
MLVU (M-Avg)
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus87.4%SourceNot directly comparable
Instruction following
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus has the higher public score estimate, 62.29 versus 43.97, but the 90% score intervals overlap. The higher estimate is not a decisive winner because the uncertainty ranges overlap.
Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher for coding on the public lane, 53.1 to 42.6. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.7 Plus are scored on Estimated evidence for coding, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like. BenchLM does not name a winner for coding from a directional reading; read the shared benchmark rows directly and test the models on the same task set.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scores higher for agentic tasks on the public lane, 47 to 37.7. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is scored on Estimated evidence for agentic tasks, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like. BenchLM does not name a winner for agentic tasks from a directional reading; read the shared benchmark rows directly and test the models on the same task set.
Which costs less, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger documented context window: 1M, compared with 256K.
Related comparisons
Last updated September 4, 2026
Watch Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Qwen3.7 Plus
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.