Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Sarvam 30B
Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #159 (Estimated); Sarvam 30B #178 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Sarvam 30B share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 18 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B; 0 to Sarvam 30B.
Updated July 27, 2026- Shared results
- 11
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- 18
- Sarvam 30B only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Sarvam 30B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 64K for Sarvam 30B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Δ | Sarvam 30B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0 | MarginNo overlap | Sarvam 30BNot measured |
| Knowledge | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 | MarginNo overlap | Sarvam 30BNot measured |
| Multimodal | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 | MarginNo overlap | Sarvam 30BNot measured |
| Inst. Following | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2 | MarginNo overlap | Sarvam 30BNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Sarvam 30B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 output | Sarvam 30B$0 input / $0 output | Listed prices are equal. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | Sarvam 30BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | Sarvam 30BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256K | Sarvam 30B64K | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Sarvam 30B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | 77.3% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | 72.2% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 72.2% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 14.9% | 6.6% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 46.9% | 63.3% | Sarvam 30B leads |
| AA-HLESource | 5.3% | 7.0% | Sarvam 30B leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -56.0% | -72.0% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 14.8% | 12.7% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 83.1% | 97.0% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Sarvam 30B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | 82.1% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Sarvam 30B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMUSource | 70.8% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLongBench-DocSource | 57.5% | — | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | 76.3% | — | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | 57.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source | 72.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AI2D_TESTSource | 88.5% | — | Not comparable |
| RefCOCO (avg)Source | 90.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 53.2% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Sarvam 30B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Sarvam 30B today?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Sarvam 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.