Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Soofi S 30B-A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 3 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 25 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B; 5 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.
Updated July 15, 2026- Shared results
- 3
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- 25
- Soofi S 30B-A3B only
- 5
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B makes more sense if knowledge is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile; Soofi S 30B-A3B is the better fit if you need the larger 1M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Soofi S 30B-A3B finish on the same provisional overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The provisional headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Soofi S 30B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Soofi S 30B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Δ | Soofi S 30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.4 | Margin← 26.5 | Soofi S 30B-A3B49.9 |
| Coding | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0 | MarginNo overlap | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot measured |
| Multimodal | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 | MarginNo overlap | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot measured |
| Inst. Following | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2 | MarginNo overlap | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 72.2%B 43.4%Winner: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BΔ 28.8GPQA: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 72.2%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 43.4%. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
MMLU-Pro
KnowledgeA 77.3%B 51.4%Winner: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BΔ 25.9MMLU-Pro: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 77.3%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 51.4%. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 output | Soofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 output | Listed prices are equal. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256K | Soofi S 30B-A3B1M | Soofi S 30B-A3B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic2 benchmarks
Coding5 benchmarks
Reasoning4 benchmarks
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B wins10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | 77.3% | 51.4% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| GPQASource | 72.2% | 43.4% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| GPQA-DSource | 72.2% | 43.4% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 14.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 46.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 5.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -56.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 14.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 83.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AGIEvalSource | — | 66.9% | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMUSource | 70.8% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLongBench-DocSource | 57.5% | — | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | 76.3% | — | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | 57.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source | 72.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AI2D_TESTSource | 88.5% | — | Not comparable |
| RefCOCO (avg)Source | 90.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 53.2% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Soofi S 30B-A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Soofi S 30B-A3B are tied on the provisional overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Soofi S 30B-A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.4 versus 49.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.