Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
Nemotron 3 Super 100B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 62 to 56. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
o3-mini is the reasoning model in the pair, while Nemotron 3 Super 100B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Nemotron 3 Super 100B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o3-mini.
Pick Nemotron 3 Super 100B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3-mini only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
56
o3-mini
82.1
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
46.3
o3-mini
49.3
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
66.4
o3-mini
87.3
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
84
o3-mini
93.9
Nemotron 3 Super 100B is ahead overall, 62 to 56. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU, where the scores are 65 and 86.9.
o3-mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.1 versus 56. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o3-mini has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 49.3 versus 46.3. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o3-mini has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 87.3 versus 66.4. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
o3-mini has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93.9 versus 84. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.