Skip to main content

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Super 100B vs o3-mini

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
49.31/100
Margin
2.7pts
← winning
OpenAI
46.59/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Super 100B #121 (Estimated); o3-mini #141 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Super 100B and o3-mini share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Nemotron 3 Super 100B; 10 to o3-mini.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
0
Nemotron 3 Super 100B only
1
o3-mini only
10
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Nemotron 3 Super 100B and o3-mini is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

o3-mini is priced at $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Super 100B. Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o3-mini.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 Super 100Bo3-miniComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Super 100B$0 input / $0 outputo3-mini$1.1 input / $4.4 outputNemotron 3 Super 100B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 Super 100B367 tok/so3-mini160 tok/sNemotron 3 Super 100B has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 Super 100B0.71 so3-mini7.12 sNemotron 3 Super 100B reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Super 100B1Mo3-mini200KNemotron 3 Super 100B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Super 100Bo3-miniResult
Claw-EvalSource 5.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 28.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Super 100Bo3-miniResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 49.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 39.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Super 100Bo3-miniResult
MMLUSource 86.9%Not comparable
GPQASource 77.2%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 74.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 8.7%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Super 100Bo3-miniResult
AIME 2024Source 87.3%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Super 100Bo3-miniResult
IFEvalSource 93.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Nemotron 3 Super 100B and o3-mini on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Nemotron 3 Super 100B and o3-mini today?

Nemotron 3 Super 100B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens o3-mini: $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026