Skip to main content

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs o1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

60/100
Margin
12.1pts
← winning
OpenAI
47.92/100
0 category wins2 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Ultra #24; o1 unranked

BenchAlign evidence: Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored; o1 estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Ultra and o1 share 14 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 25 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Ultra; 3 to o1.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
14
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
25
o1 only
3
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Nemotron 3 Ultra is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 60 to 55. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

o1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $15.00 input / $60.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Ultra. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Nemotron 3 Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nemotron 3 Ultra and o1
CategoryNemotron 3 UltraΔo1
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Ultra54.2Margin 21.5o175.7
Inst. FollowingNemotron 3 Ultra81.7Margin 10.5o192.2
AgenticNemotron 3 Ultra51.3MarginNo overlapo1Not measured
CodingNemotron 3 Ultra58.3MarginNo overlapo1Not measured
ReasoningNemotron 3 Ultra61.9MarginNo overlapo1Not measured
MathNemotron 3 UltraNot measuredMarginNo overlapo19.3
MultilingualNemotron 3 Ultra83.0MarginNo overlapo1Not measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Nemotron 3 UltraB · o1
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 87%B 75.7%
    Winner: Nemotron 3 UltraΔ 11.3
    GPQA: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 87%; o1 scored 75.7%. Nemotron 3 Ultra wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 Ultrao1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 outputo1$15 input / $60 outputNemotron 3 Ultra has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 UltraNot availableo198 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 UltraNot availableo132.29 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Ultra1Mo1200KNemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
PinchBenchSource 90.0%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 44.4%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 70.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 33.2%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 37.4%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 27.4%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 83.3%62.6%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GDPval-AASource 1164Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 870Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 28.9%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 3.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 71.9%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 67.7%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 89.0%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 44.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 49.3%39.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Terminal-Bench HardSource 36.4%12.9%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-SciCodeSource 39.9%35.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1Result
AA-LCRSource 67.0%59.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
CritPtSource 3.1%0.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
LongBench v2Source 61.9%Not comparable
Knowledgeo1 wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1Result
GPQASource 87%75.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GPQA-DSource 87.0%Not comparable
HLESource 26.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 26.7%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 86.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 21.6%34.7%o1 leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 37.8%23.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.7%74.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-HLESource 26.6%7.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -0.8%-10.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 28.5%69.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA Openness IndexSource 83.3%Not comparable
MMLUSource 91.8%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 9.310%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1Result
MMLU-ProXSource 83%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1132Not comparable
Inst. Followingo1 wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Ultrao1Result
IFBenchSource 81.7%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 81.4%70.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
IFEvalSource 92.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra or o1?

Nemotron 3 Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 60 to 55. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 87% and 75.7%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Nemotron 3 Ultra or o1?

o1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.7 versus 54.2. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Nemotron 3 Ultra or o1?

o1 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 92.2 versus 81.7. Inside this category, AA-IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.