Skip to main content

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Phi-4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

60/100
Margin
37.4pts
← winning
Microsoft
22.57/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Ultra #24; Phi-4 unranked

BenchAlign evidence: Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored; Phi-4 supported. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Ultra and Phi-4 share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 27 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Ultra; 0 to Phi-4.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
12
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
27
Phi-4 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Phi-4 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Nemotron 3 Ultra has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 16K for Phi-4.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Phi-4
CategoryNemotron 3 UltraΔPhi-4
AgenticNemotron 3 Ultra51.3MarginNo overlapPhi-4Not measured
CodingNemotron 3 Ultra58.3MarginNo overlapPhi-4Not measured
ReasoningNemotron 3 Ultra61.9MarginNo overlapPhi-4Not measured
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Ultra54.2MarginNo overlapPhi-4Not measured
MultilingualNemotron 3 Ultra83.0MarginNo overlapPhi-4Not measured
Inst. FollowingNemotron 3 Ultra81.7MarginNo overlapPhi-4Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 UltraPhi-4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 outputPhi-4$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 UltraNot availablePhi-435 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 UltraNot availablePhi-42.02 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Ultra1MPhi-416KNemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraPhi-4Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
PinchBenchSource 90.0%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 44.4%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 70.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 33.2%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 37.4%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 27.4%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 83.3%0%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GDPval-AASource 1164Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 870Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 28.9%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 3.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraPhi-4Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 71.9%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 67.7%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 89.0%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 44.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 49.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 36.4%3.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-SciCodeSource 39.9%26.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraPhi-4Result
AA-LCRSource 67.0%0.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
CritPtSource 3.1%0.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
LongBench v2Source 61.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraPhi-4Result
GPQASource 87%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.0%Not comparable
HLESource 26.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 26.7%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 86.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 21.6%13.2%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 37.8%4.9%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.7%57.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-HLESource 26.6%4.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -0.8%-56.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 28.5%80.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA Openness IndexSource 83.3%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraPhi-4Result
MMLU-ProXSource 83%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraPhi-4Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1132Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraPhi-4Result
IFBenchSource 81.7%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 81.4%23.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Nemotron 3 Ultra and Phi-4 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Phi-4 today?

Nemotron 3 Ultra: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Phi-4: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.