Model A

NVIDIA

40.67/100

Estimated · Public rank #188

90% interval 30.8–50.5

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Updated September 4, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.

Model B

Qwen3.7 Plus

Alibaba

62.29/100

Supported · Public rank #60

90% interval 52.4–72.2

Decision reading

Qwen3.7 Plus has the higher public score, 62.29 versus 40.67, and the 90% score intervals do not overlap.

13 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Share or export

Share on X LinkedInSocial card CSV JSON

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus leads on the public agentic lane, 37.7 to 22.2, with Supported evidence for both models and non-overlapping 90% intervals.
Confidence: stronger

Show secondary and unsupported calls

Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
Qwen3.7 Plus is scored on Estimated evidence for coding, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like.
Confidence: limited
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
No clear pick
The documented context windows are equal.
Confidence: documented
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

11 Nemotron 3 Ultra only

13 Shared

39 Qwen3.7 Plus only

Shared results: 13
Nemotron 3 Ultra only: 11
Qwen3.7 Plus only: 39
Like-for-like categories: 3 / 8

2 categories rest on Estimated evidence or different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.

Agentic

Like-for-like

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 22.2; Supported · #150/151
Qwen3.7 Plus: 37.7; Supported · #126/151
Basis: BenchAlign lane · 6 vs 11 public rows
Reading: Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Multilingual

Like-for-like

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 47.4; #7/12
Qwen3.7 Plus: 78.9; #3/12
Basis: Provisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading: Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Instruction following

Like-for-like

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 88.7; #28/120
Qwen3.7 Plus: 91.1; #17/120
Basis: Provisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading: Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Coding

Directional only

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 26.9; Supported · #174/183
Qwen3.7 Plus: 53.1; Estimated · #51/183
Basis: BenchAlign lane · 7 vs 7 public rows
Reading: Directional only

Knowledge

Directional only

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 45.6; Estimated · #114/181
Qwen3.7 Plus: 56.8; Estimated · #50/181
Basis: BenchAlign lane · 7 vs 7 public rows
Reading: Directional only

Reasoning

Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 48.7; Unranked · 1 rankable row
Qwen3.7 Plus: 73.7; Unranked · 3 rankable rows
Basis: Provisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading: Not comparable

Math

Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Ultra: Not ranked
Qwen3.7 Plus: 78.3; Unranked · 3 rankable rows
Basis: Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading: Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Ultra: Not ranked
Qwen3.7 Plus: 72.5; #18/48
Basis: Provisional lane · 0 vs 2 weighted rows
Reading: Not comparable

Category scores with the server-provided evidence basis for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus
Category	Nemotron 3 Ultra	Qwen3.7 Plus	Basis	Reading
Agentic	22.2Supported · #150/151	37.7Supported · #126/151	Like-for-likeBenchAlign lane · 6 vs 11 public rows	Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Multilingual	47.4#7/12	78.9#3/12	Like-for-likeProvisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows	Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Instruction following	88.7#28/120	91.1#17/120	Like-for-likeProvisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows	Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Coding	26.9Supported · #174/183	53.1Estimated · #51/183	Directional onlyBenchAlign lane · 7 vs 7 public rows	Directional only
Knowledge	45.6Estimated · #114/181	56.8Estimated · #50/181	Directional onlyBenchAlign lane · 7 vs 7 public rows	Directional only
Reasoning	48.7Unranked · 1 rankable row	73.7Unranked · 3 rankable rows	Not comparableProvisional lane · 1 vs 1 weighted rows	Not comparable
Math	Not ranked	78.3Unranked · 3 rankable rows	Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows	Not comparable
Multimodal	Not ranked	72.5#18/48	Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 2 weighted rows	Not comparable

Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.

Terminal-Bench 2.0
Agentic
Nemotron 3 Ultra: 56.4%Qwen3.7 Plus: 70.3%Normalized gap 13.9Nemotron 3 Ultra source Qwen3.7 Plus source
SWE Multilingual
Coding
Nemotron 3 Ultra: 67.7%Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8%Normalized gap 8.1Nemotron 3 Ultra source Qwen3.7 Plus source
HLE
Knowledge
Nemotron 3 Ultra: 26.7%Qwen3.7 Plus: 34.7%Normalized gap 8.0Nemotron 3 Ultra source Qwen3.7 Plus source
SciCode
Coding
Nemotron 3 Ultra: 44.6%Qwen3.7 Plus: 51.3%Normalized gap 6.7Nemotron 3 Ultra source Qwen3.7 Plus source
SWE-bench Verified
Coding
Nemotron 3 Ultra: 71.9%Qwen3.7 Plus: 77.7%Normalized gap 5.8Nemotron 3 Ultra source Qwen3.7 Plus source

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3 Ultra: Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies; Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus: API rate not published; Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.7 Plus has no comparable published API token rate.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Ultra: Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies; Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus: API rate not published; Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.7 Plus has no comparable published API token rate.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Ultra: Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies; Fits in one request; Cached-input rate unavailable
Qwen3.7 Plus: API rate not published; Fits in one request; Cached-input rate unavailable

Nemotron 3 Ultra has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.7 Plus has no comparable published API token rate.

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

SpecificationNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 Plus

Context window

Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.

Nemotron 3 Ultra

Qwen3.7 Plus

API model ID

Nemotron 3 Ultra

Not sourced

Qwen3.7 Plus

Not sourced

Cached-input rate

A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.

Nemotron 3 Ultra

No comparable hosted API rate

Qwen3.7 Plus

No comparable hosted API rate

Documented inputs

Nemotron 3 Ultra

Not sourced

Qwen3.7 Plus

Not sourced

Documented outputs

Nemotron 3 Ultra

Not sourced

Qwen3.7 Plus

Not sourced

Provider availability

Nemotron 3 Ultra

Not sourced

Qwen3.7 Plus

Not sourced

Reasoning profile

Nemotron 3 Ultra

Reasoning

Qwen3.7 Plus

Reasoning

Weight access

Nemotron 3 Ultra

Open Weight

Qwen3.7 Plus

Proprietary

License

Nemotron 3 Ultra

Open Weight

Qwen3.7 Plus

Proprietary

Release date

Nemotron 3 Ultra

2026-06-04

Qwen3.7 Plus

2026-06-03

If you already use one of these models

Deployment change: The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal: Qwen3.7 Plus has the higher public score, 62.29 versus 40.67, and the 90% score intervals do not overlap.
Workload cost: A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Context tradeoff: Both models list 1M.

Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence63 rows

Agentic

Terminal-Bench 2.0
Nemotron 3 Ultra56.4%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus70.3%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result
PinchBench
Nemotron 3 Ultra90.0%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus—
Not directly comparable
BrowseComp
Nemotron 3 Ultra44.4%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus—
Not directly comparable
τ³-bench results
Nemotron 3 Ultra70.9%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus—
Not directly comparable
HLE w/ tools
Nemotron 3 Ultra37.4%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus—
Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)
Nemotron 3 Ultra50.9%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus52.8%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result
QwenClawBench
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus61.8%
Source
Not directly comparable
Claw-Eval
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus62.7%
Source
Not directly comparable
BFCL v4
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus72.9%
Source
Not directly comparable
MCP Atlas
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus73.2%
Source
Not directly comparable
VITA-Bench
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus45.6%
Source
Not directly comparable
DeepPlanning
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus62.3%
Source
Not directly comparable
OSWorld-Verified
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus73.3%
Source
Not directly comparable
AndroidWorld
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus81.0%
Source
Not directly comparable
OSWorld 2.0
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus2.8%
Source
Not directly comparable

Coding

SWE-bench Verified
Nemotron 3 Ultra71.9%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus77.7%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result
SWE Multilingual
Nemotron 3 Ultra67.7%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus75.8%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result
LiveCodeBench v6
Nemotron 3 Ultra89.0%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus—
Not directly comparable
SciCode
Nemotron 3 Ultra44.6%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus51.3%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Nemotron 3 Ultra56.4%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus70.3%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result
LiveCodeBench (Vals)
Nemotron 3 Ultra86.0%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus—
Not directly comparable
SWE-bench (Vals)
Nemotron 3 Ultra69.0%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus—
Not directly comparable
SWE-bench Pro
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus57.6%
Source
Not directly comparable
NL2Repo
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus41.1%
Source
Not directly comparable
LiveCodeBench
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus89.6%
Source
Not directly comparable

Reasoning

CritPt
Nemotron 3 Ultra3.1%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus9.1%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result
LongBench v2
Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus—
Not directly comparable
MRCRv2
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus91.7%
Source
Not directly comparable

Knowledge

GPQA
Nemotron 3 Ultra87%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus90.3%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result
GPQA-D
Nemotron 3 Ultra87.0%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus90.3%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result
HLE
Nemotron 3 Ultra26.7%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus34.7%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result
HLE w/o tools
Nemotron 3 Ultra26.7%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus—
Not directly comparable
MMLU-Pro
Nemotron 3 Ultra86.8%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus88.5%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result
GPQA Diamond (Vals)
Nemotron 3 Ultra86.1%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus—
Not directly comparable
MMLU-Pro (Vals)
Nemotron 3 Ultra85.8%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus—
Not directly comparable
MMLU-Redux
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus94.5%
Source
Not directly comparable
SuperGPQA
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus71.4%
Source
Not directly comparable
MMMLU
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus89.0%
Source
Not directly comparable

Math

HMMT Feb 2026
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus92.9%
Source
Not directly comparable
IMOAnswerBench
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus86.0%
Source
Not directly comparable
Apex
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus22.7%
Source
Not directly comparable

Multilingual

MMLU-ProX
Nemotron 3 Ultra83%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus85.4%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus leads this result
NOVA-63
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus58.8%
Source
Not directly comparable
INCLUDE
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus83.0%
Source
Not directly comparable
MAXIFE
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus88.8%
Source
Not directly comparable
PolyMath
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus84.0%
Source
Not directly comparable

Multimodal

MMMU-Pro
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus79%
Source
Not directly comparable
MathVision
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus90.3%
Source
Not directly comparable
CharXiv
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus85.9%
Source
Not directly comparable
ERQA
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus69.8%
Source
Not directly comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus71.0%
Source
Not directly comparable
ScreenSpot Pro
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus79.0%
Source
Not directly comparable
SimpleVQA
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus81.7%
Source
Not directly comparable
MMSearch-Plus
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus41.4%
Source
Not directly comparable
RealWorldQA
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus86.9%
Source
Not directly comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus91.4%
Source
Not directly comparable
OCRBench V2
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus70.7%
Source
Not directly comparable
ODINW13
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus51.1%
Source
Not directly comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus88.0%
Source
Not directly comparable
VideoMMMU
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus85.4%
Source
Not directly comparable
MLVU (M-Avg)
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus87.4%
Source
Not directly comparable

Instruction following

IFBench
Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7%
Source
Qwen3.7 Plus79.1%
Source
Nemotron 3 Ultra leads this result
IFEval
Nemotron 3 Ultra—
Qwen3.7 Plus94.6%
Source
Not directly comparable

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the higher public score, 62.29 versus 40.67, and the 90% score intervals do not overlap. That is the clearest overall quality signal in the current public data.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher for coding on the public lane, 53.1 to 26.9. Qwen3.7 Plus is scored on Estimated evidence for coding, so the reading is directional rather than like-for-like. BenchLM does not name a winner for coding from a directional reading; read the shared benchmark rows directly and test the models on the same task set.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus leads the public agentic tasks lane, 37.7 to 22.2, with Supported evidence for both models and non-overlapping 90% intervals.

Which costs less, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.

Which has the larger context window, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Both models list the same context window, 1M.

Related comparisons

Compare API pricing Read the methodology Open the model selector

Last updated September 4, 2026

Watch Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Plus

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Which one for your work

Agentic work

Coding work

Long documents

Chat turn cost

Cache-heavy agent loop cost

Repository review cost

What is actually comparable

Category results, on a stated basis

Agentic

Multilingual

Instruction following

Coding

Knowledge

Reasoning

Math

Multimodal

Shape of the matched evidence

What each workload costs

Chat turn

Repository review

Cache-heavy agent loop

Specification differences

Context window

API model ID

Cached-input rate

Documented inputs

Documented outputs

Provider availability

Reasoning profile

Weight access

License

Release date

Benchmark evidence

Agentic

Coding

Reasoning

Knowledge

Math

Multilingual

Multimodal

Instruction following

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Which is better for agentic tasks, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Which costs less, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Which has the larger context window, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Related comparisons

Watch Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Plus