Skip to main content

Model comparison

Nova Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Amazon
20.32/100
Margin
39.2pts
winning →
59.5/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Nova Pro #196 (Supported); Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) #56 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nova Pro and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Nova Pro; 5 to Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
12
Nova Pro only
0
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) only
5
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Nova Pro and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNova ProQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNova ProNot availableQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3.6 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondNova Pro141 tok/sQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNova Pro0.81 sQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNova Pro128KQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 14%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 19.9%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 15.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 23.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 962Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-SciCodeSource 20.8%42.0%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA Coding IndexSource 48.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 19.0%65.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 0.0%1.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 7.7%33.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 49.9%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 3.4%27.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -47.6%-29.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.0%31.4%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 77.9%89.1%Nova Pro leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 44.3%77.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkNova ProQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 38.1%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Nova Pro and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Nova Pro and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) today?

Nova Pro: Pricing unavailable Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.