Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model profile

Nova Pro

AmazonEstablishedReleased Apr 1, 2025
Data verified
Overall Score
20.32Public #196 of 200Verified #95 of 99
Arena Elo
1059
Eligible category ranks
0of 8
Price (1M tokens)
Not listedAPI pricing
Speed
141tok/s
Context
128K

Evidence coverage

12 of 321 tracked benchmarks are published. 0 are verified and 12 provisional. 6 of 8 categories are measured.

Updated July 20, 2026Methodology
Published / tracked
12 / 321
Verified
0
Provisional
12
Categories with evidence
6 / 8

Evidence by category

  • Agentic1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Coding1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Reasoning2 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Knowledge6 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Math0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multilingual0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multimodal1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Inst. Following1 benchmark
    Reported
ProprietaryNon-Reasoning
Confidence:
Low
base

Nova Pro ranks #196 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 20.32/100. It also ranks #95 out of 99 on the verified leaderboard. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.

Nova Pro is a proprietary model with a 128K token context window. It processes queries without explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, offering faster response times and lower token usage.

This profile currently has 12 of 321 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

Peer position

Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.

Range 18.27–22.69

  1. Phi-4
    Microsoft
    #19222.69
    Phi-4 is #192 with a score of 22.69.
    Compare
  2. Gemini 1.0 Pro
    Google
    #19321.78
    Gemini 1.0 Pro is #193 with a score of 21.78.
    Compare
  3. Claude 3 Haiku
    Anthropic
    #19421.39
    Claude 3 Haiku is #194 with a score of 21.39.
    Compare
  4. Ministral 3 8B
    Mistral
    #19520.96
    Ministral 3 8B is #195 with a score of 20.96.
    Compare
  5. Nova ProCurrent model
    Amazon
    #19620.32
    Nova Pro is #196 with a score of 20.32.
  6. LFM2-24B-A2B
    LiquidAI
    #19718.87
    LFM2-24B-A2B is #197 with a score of 18.87.
    Compare
  7. Ministral 3 3B
    Mistral
    #19818.27
    Ministral 3 3B is #198 with a score of 18.27.
    Compare

Category percentile

More

Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.

No eligible category percentile is available from the published evidence yet.

Category evidence

Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticRank Not rankedWeight 22%1 benchmarkReported33.6
CodingRank Not rankedWeight 20%1 benchmarkReported16.2
ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%2 benchmarksReported51.0
KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%6 benchmarksReported27.5
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkReported40.6
Inst. FollowingRank Not rankedWeight 5%1 benchmarkReported66.0

Chatbot Arena performance

Scroll horizontally to inspect confidence intervals and vote counts.

Chatbot Arena Elo, confidence interval, and vote count by evaluation view
ViewEloConfidence intervalVotes
Text Overall1059Not availableNot available

Benchmark Details

Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.

Agentic1 benchmark
τ²-bench resultsReported

τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation

14%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Coding1 benchmark
AA-SciCodeReported

Artificial Analysis SciCode

20.8%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Reasoning2 benchmarks
AA-LCRReported

Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning

19.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
CritPtReported

Critical Physics Tasks

0.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Knowledge6 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexReported
7.7%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-GPQA DiamondReported

Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond

49.9%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-HLEReported

Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam

3.4%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience IndexReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index

-47.6%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience AccuracyReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy

17.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate

77.9%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Multimodal1 benchmark
AA-MMMU-ProReported

Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro

44.3%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Inst. Following1 benchmark
AA-IFBenchReported

Artificial Analysis IFBench

38.1%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Nova Pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Nova Pro has 12 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.

Is Nova Pro good for knowledge and understanding?

Nova Pro has visible benchmark coverage in knowledge and understanding, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Nova Pro good for coding and programming?

Nova Pro has visible benchmark coverage in coding and programming, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Nova Pro good for reasoning and logic?

Nova Pro has visible benchmark coverage in reasoning and logic, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Nova Pro good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Nova Pro has visible benchmark coverage in agentic tool use and computer tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Nova Pro good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

Nova Pro has visible benchmark coverage in multimodal and grounded tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Nova Pro good for instruction following?

Nova Pro has visible benchmark coverage in instruction following, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Does Nova Pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

Not yet. Nova Pro currently has 12 published benchmark scores out of the 321 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

What is the context window size of Nova Pro?

Nova Pro has a published context window of 128K, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.

Related Resources

More from Amazon LLM Pricing Comparison BenchLM Methodology The AI Race Which LLM Should I Use? Benchmark Explainers
Last updated: July 20, 2026 · Runtime metrics stay blank until BenchLM has a sourced snapshot.

Choose with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.

Free. One email per week.