Skip to main content

Model comparison

o1 vs Soofi S 30B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

OpenAI
55/100
Margin
10.0pts
← winning
Soofi Project
45/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. o1 and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to o1; 7 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
1
o1 only
16
Soofi S 30B-A3B only
7
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick o1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Soofi S 30B-A3B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

o1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 55 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

o1's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 75.7 against 49.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 75.7% to 43.4%.

o1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $15.00 input / $60.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Soofi S 30B-A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. o1 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Soofi S 30B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Soofi S 30B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for o1 and Soofi S 30B-A3B
Categoryo1ΔSoofi S 30B-A3B
Knowledgeo175.7Margin 25.8Soofi S 30B-A3B49.9
Matho19.3MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
Inst. Followingo192.2MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · o1B · Soofi S 30B-A3B
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 75.7%B 43.4%
    Winner: o1Δ 32.3
    GPQA: o1 scored 75.7%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 43.4%. o1 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

Metrico1Soofi S 30B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokenso1$15 input / $60 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondo198 tok/sSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokeno132.29 sSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokenso1200KSoofi S 30B-A3B1MSoofi S 30B-A3B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
Benchmarko1Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 62.6%Not comparable
Coding
Benchmarko1Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA Coding IndexSource 39.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 12.9%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 35.8%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 73.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
Benchmarko1Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA-LCRSource 59.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.3%Not comparable
BBHSource 78.8%Not comparable
DROPSource 66.5%Not comparable
Knowledgeo1 wins
Benchmarko1Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
MMLUSource 91.8%Not comparable
GPQASource 75.7%43.4%o1 leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 23.4%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 74.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 7.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -10.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 34.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 69.3%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 43.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 51.4%Not comparable
AGIEvalSource 66.9%Not comparable
Math
Benchmarko1Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 9.310%Not comparable
GSM8KSource 86.1%Not comparable
Inst. Following
Benchmarko1Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
IFEvalSource 92.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 70.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, o1 or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

o1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 55 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 75.7% and 43.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, o1 or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

o1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.7 versus 49.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.