Skip to main content

o3-mini vs Qwen3.5-27B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

o3-mini

56

VS

Qwen3.5-27B

63

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: o3-mini unranked · Qwen3.5-27B #16

Pick Qwen3.5-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3-mini only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Qwen3.5-27B
49.3vs63

+13.7 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.5-27B
77.2vs80.6

+3.4 difference

Inst. Following

Qwen3.5-27B
93.9vs95

+1.1 difference

Operational Comparison

o3-mini

Qwen3.5-27B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.1 / $4.4

$0 / $0

Speed

160 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

7.12s

N/A

Context Window

200K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.5-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3-mini only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Qwen3.5-27B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 63 to 56. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.5-27B's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 63 against 49.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 49.3% to 72.4%.

o3-mini is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5-27B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Qwen3.5-27B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 200K for o3-mini.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, o3-mini or Qwen3.5-27B?

Qwen3.5-27B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 63 to 56. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 49.3% and 72.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, o3-mini or Qwen3.5-27B?

Qwen3.5-27B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.6 versus 77.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, o3-mini or Qwen3.5-27B?

Qwen3.5-27B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 63 versus 49.3. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, o3-mini or Qwen3.5-27B?

Qwen3.5-27B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 95 versus 93.9. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 13, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.