Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Ornith-1.0-35B
67
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
62
Verified leaderboard positions: Ornith-1.0-35B unranked · Qwen3.6-35B-A3B #29
Pick Ornith-1.0-35B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+12.7 difference
Ornith-1.0-35B
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
262K
262K
Pick Ornith-1.0-35B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Ornith-1.0-35B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 67 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Ornith-1.0-35B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 64.2 against 51.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 64.2% to 51.5%.
Ornith-1.0-35B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 67 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 64.2% and 51.5%.
Ornith-1.0-35B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 64.2 versus 51.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.