Skip to main content

Model comparison

Ornith-1.0-397B vs Qwen3.5 Flash

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Benchmark data for one or both models is coming soon. This page currently shows metadata and pricing where BenchLM has it, and score-level comparisons will populate as public benchmark results land.
DeepReinforce AI
73/100
Margin
25.0pts
← winning
48/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Ornith-1.0-397B and Qwen3.5 Flash share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to Ornith-1.0-397B; 2 to Qwen3.5 Flash.

Updated July 14, 2026
Shared results
0
Ornith-1.0-397B only
7
Qwen3.5 Flash only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Ornith-1.0-397B and Qwen3.5 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3.5 Flash is priced at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Ornith-1.0-397B. Qwen3.5 Flash has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Ornith-1.0-397B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricOrnith-1.0-397BQwen3.5 FlashComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensOrnith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.5 Flash$0.1 input / $0.4 outputOrnith-1.0-397B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondOrnith-1.0-397BNot availableQwen3.5 FlashNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenOrnith-1.0-397BNot availableQwen3.5 FlashNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensOrnith-1.0-397B256KQwen3.5 Flash1MQwen3.5 Flash lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkOrnith-1.0-397BQwen3.5 FlashResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 77.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkOrnith-1.0-397BQwen3.5 FlashResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 82.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 62.2%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 78.9%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource 48.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.5%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkOrnith-1.0-397BQwen3.5 FlashResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 6.207%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Ornith-1.0-397B and Qwen3.5 Flash on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Ornith-1.0-397B and Qwen3.5 Flash today?

Ornith-1.0-397B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.5 Flash: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 14, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.