Model A

Pokee AI

—

Evidence status unavailable

90% interval unavailable

Pokee-Isaac 28B vs Qwen3.8-27B

Updated August 14, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.

Model B

Qwen3.8-27B

Alibaba

—

Evidence status unavailable

90% interval unavailable

Decision reading

At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.

2 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented

Show secondary and unsupported calls

Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: rate-fallback
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

5 Pokee-Isaac 28B only

2 Shared

25 Qwen3.8-27B only

Shared results: 2
Pokee-Isaac 28B only: 5
Qwen3.8-27B only: 25
Like-for-like categories: 0 / 8

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.

Agentic

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.8-27B: 84.3
Weighted basis: 0 vs 1 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Coding

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.8-27B: 61.7
Weighted basis: 0 vs 1 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Reasoning

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: 60.7
Qwen3.8-27B: Not measured
Weighted basis: 1 vs 0 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Knowledge

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.8-27B: 38.7
Weighted basis: 0 vs 2 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Math

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.8-27B: Not measured
Weighted basis: 0 vs 0 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.8-27B: Not measured
Weighted basis: 0 vs 0 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.8-27B: 90.2
Weighted basis: 0 vs 1 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Instruction following

Not comparable

Pokee-Isaac 28B: Not measured
Qwen3.8-27B: 79.5
Weighted basis: 0 vs 1 rows
Reading: Not comparable

Category averages with the server-provided evidence basis for Pokee-Isaac 28B and Qwen3.8-27B
Category	Pokee-Isaac 28B	Qwen3.8-27B	Weighted basis	Reading
Agentic	Not measured	84.3	Not comparable0 vs 1 rows	Not comparable
Coding	Not measured	61.7	Not comparable0 vs 1 rows	Not comparable
Reasoning	60.7	Not measured	Not comparable1 vs 0 rows	Not comparable
Knowledge	Not measured	38.7	Not comparable0 vs 2 rows	Not comparable
Math	Not measured	Not measured	Not comparable0 vs 0 rows	Not comparable
Multilingual	Not measured	Not measured	Not comparable0 vs 0 rows	Not comparable
Multimodal	Not measured	90.2	Not comparable0 vs 1 rows	Not comparable
Instruction following	Not measured	79.5	Not comparable0 vs 1 rows	Not comparable

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

A shared-evidence shape is not available.

BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

Pokee-Isaac 28B: $0.00065; Fits in one request
Qwen3.8-27B: Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies; Fits in one request

Qwen3.8-27B has no comparable published API token rate.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

Pokee-Isaac 28B: $0.0105; Fits in one request
Qwen3.8-27B: Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies; Fits in one request

Qwen3.8-27B has no comparable published API token rate.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

Pokee-Isaac 28B: $0.043; Fits in one request; Cached input priced at the published list-input rate
Qwen3.8-27B: Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies; Fits in one request; Cached-input rate unavailable

Pokee-Isaac 28B has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate. Qwen3.8-27B has no comparable published API token rate.

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

SpecificationPokee-Isaac 28BQwen3.8-27B

Context window

Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.

Pokee-Isaac 28B

10M

Pokee-Isaac 28B model page

Qwen3.8-27B

262K

Qwen3.8-27B model card

API model ID

Pokee-Isaac 28B

pokee-isaac

Pokee-Isaac 28B model page

Qwen3.8-27B

Not sourced

Cached-input rate

A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Not published

Pokee-Isaac 28B model page

Qwen3.8-27B

No comparable hosted API rate

Qwen3.8-27B model card

Documented inputs

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Not sourced

Qwen3.8-27B

Not sourced

Documented outputs

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Not sourced

Qwen3.8-27B

Not sourced

Provider availability

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Not sourced

Qwen3.8-27B

Not sourced

Reasoning profile

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Reasoning

Qwen3.8-27B

Reasoning

Weight access

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Proprietary

Qwen3.8-27B

Open Weight

License

Pokee-Isaac 28B

Proprietary

Qwen3.8-27B

Open Weight

Release date

Pokee-Isaac 28B

2026-08-03

Qwen3.8-27B

2026-08-05

If you already use one of these models

Deployment change: The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal: At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
Workload cost: A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Context tradeoff: Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger documented window (10M).

Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence32 rows

Agentic

Terminal-Bench 2.1
Pokee-Isaac 28B65.1%
Source
Qwen3.8-27B73.0%
Source
Qwen3.8-27B leads this result
BFCL v4
Pokee-Isaac 28B70.9%
Source
Qwen3.8-27B—
Not directly comparable
τ³-bench results
Pokee-Isaac 28B66.2%
Source
Qwen3.8-27B—
Not directly comparable
MCP-Atlas claim coverage
Pokee-Isaac 28B74.6%
Source
Qwen3.8-27B—
Not directly comparable
PinchBench
Pokee-Isaac 28B95.7%
Source
Qwen3.8-27B—
Not directly comparable
CoWorkBench
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B70.7%
Source
Not directly comparable
JobBench
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B33.4%
Source
Not directly comparable
Agents' Last Exam
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B42.9%
Source
Not directly comparable
OSWorld-Verified
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B84.3%
Source
Not directly comparable
WebArena-Verified
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B64.8%
Source
Not directly comparable
AndroidWorld
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B81.9%
Source
Not directly comparable

Coding

Terminal-Bench 2.1
Pokee-Isaac 28B65.1%
Source
Qwen3.8-27B73.0%
Source
Qwen3.8-27B leads this result
SWE-bench Pro
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B61.7%
Source
Not directly comparable
NL2Repo
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B42.3%
Source
Not directly comparable
deepSwe
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B42.2%
Source
Not directly comparable
LiveCodeBench v6
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B90.3%
Source
Not directly comparable

Reasoning

MRCRv2
Pokee-Isaac 28B60.7%
Source
Qwen3.8-27B—
Not directly comparable

Knowledge

GPQA
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B89.2%
Source
Not directly comparable
GPQA-D
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B89.2%
Source
Not directly comparable
HLE
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B30.8%
Source
Not directly comparable
HLE w/o tools
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B30.8%
Source
Not directly comparable

Multimodal

MathVision
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B90.0%
Source
Not directly comparable
MathVision w/ Python
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B94.6%
Source
Not directly comparable
BabyVision
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B65.7%
Source
Not directly comparable
BabyVision w/ Python
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B85.6%
Source
Not directly comparable
Vision2Web
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B62.9%
Source
Not directly comparable
CharXiv w/o tools
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B83.7%
Source
Not directly comparable
CharXiv
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B90.2%
Source
Not directly comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B91.1%
Source
Not directly comparable
RealWorldQA
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B85.9%
Source
Not directly comparable
ERQA
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B65.5%
Source
Not directly comparable

Instruction following

IFBench
Pokee-Isaac 28B—
Qwen3.8-27B79.5%
Source
Not directly comparable

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.8-27B?

At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.

Which is better for coding, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.8-27B?

The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted coding basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a coding winner.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.8-27B?

The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted agentic tasks basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a agentic tasks winner.

Which costs less, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.8-27B?

Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.

Which has the larger context window, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.8-27B?

Pokee-Isaac 28B has the larger documented context window: 10M, compared with 262K.

Related comparisons

Compare API pricing Read the methodology Open the model selector

Last updated August 14, 2026

Watch Pokee-Isaac 28B vs Qwen3.8-27B

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.

Pokee-Isaac 28B vs Qwen3.8-27B

Which one for your work

Long documents

Coding work

Agentic work

Chat turn cost

Cache-heavy agent loop cost

Repository review cost

What is actually comparable

Category results, on a stated basis

Agentic

Coding

Reasoning

Knowledge

Math

Multilingual

Multimodal

Instruction following

Shape of the matched evidence

What each workload costs

Chat turn

Repository review

Cache-heavy agent loop

Specification differences

Context window

API model ID

Cached-input rate

Documented inputs

Documented outputs

Provider availability

Reasoning profile

Weight access

License

Release date

Benchmark evidence

Agentic

Coding

Reasoning

Knowledge

Multimodal

Instruction following

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.8-27B?

Which is better for coding, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.8-27B?

Which is better for agentic tasks, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.8-27B?

Which costs less, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.8-27B?

Which has the larger context window, Pokee-Isaac 28B or Qwen3.8-27B?

Related comparisons

Watch Pokee-Isaac 28B vs Qwen3.8-27B