Model comparison
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Trinity-Large-Preview
Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct #186 (Supported); Trinity-Large-Preview #79 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Trinity-Large-Preview share 4 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct; 14 to Trinity-Large-Preview.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 4
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
- 0
- Trinity-Large-Preview only
- 14
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Trinity-Large-Preview is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Trinity-Large-Preview is priced at $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct. Trinity-Large-Preview has the larger context window at 512K, compared with 128K for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Trinity-Large-Preview | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0 input / $0 output | Trinity-Large-Preview$0.25 input / $1 output | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructNot available | Trinity-Large-PreviewNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructNot available | Trinity-Large-PreviewNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct128K | Trinity-Large-Preview512K | Trinity-Large-Preview lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic3 benchmarks
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Trinity-Large-Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | 27.1% | 36.1% | Trinity-Large-Preview leads |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Trinity-Large-Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 7.1% | 24.5% | Trinity-Large-Preview leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 41.7% | 75.2% | Trinity-Large-Preview leads |
| AA-HLESource | 3.8% | 14.7% | Trinity-Large-Preview leads |
| MMLUSource | — | 87.2% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source | — | 75.2% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 63.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -44.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 22.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 86.6% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Trinity-Large-Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME25 (Arcee)Source | — | 24.0% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Trinity-Large-Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1165 | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Trinity-Large-Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 56.3% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Trinity-Large-Preview on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Trinity-Large-Preview today?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Trinity-Large-Preview: $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.