Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
~50
0/8 categoriesSarvam 105B
60
Winner · 1/8 categoriesQwen2.5-VL-32B· Sarvam 105B
Pick Sarvam 105B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen2.5-VL-32B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Sarvam 105B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 60 to 50. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Sarvam 105B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.7 against 60.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 68.8% to 81.7%.
Sarvam 105B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Qwen2.5-VL-32B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Sarvam 105B gives you the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for Qwen2.5-VL-32B.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL-32B | Sarvam 105B |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic | ||
| BrowseComp | — | 49.5% |
| Coding | ||
| HumanEval | 91.5% | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | — | 71.7% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 45% |
| Multimodal & Grounded | ||
| MMMU-Pro | 49.5% | — |
| Reasoning | ||
| gpqaDiamond | — | 78.7% |
| hle | — | 11.2% |
| KnowledgeSarvam 105B wins | ||
| GPQA | 46% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 68.8% | 81.7% |
| MMLU | — | 90.6% |
| Instruction Following | ||
| IFEval | — | 84.8% |
| Multilingual | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Mathematics | ||
| MATH-500 | — | 98.6% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 88.3% |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | — | 85.8% |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | — | 85.8% |
Sarvam 105B is ahead overall, 60 to 50. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 68.8% and 81.7%.
Sarvam 105B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.7 versus 60.8. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.