Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Step 3.5 Flash is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 66 to 38. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Step 3.5 Flash's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 78.3 against 43.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MuSR, 82 to 39.
Step 3.5 Flash gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 32K for Qwen2.5-VL-32B.
Pick Step 3.5 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen2.5-VL-32B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Step 3.5 Flash
60.2
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
33.5
Step 3.5 Flash
47.1
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
14.3
Step 3.5 Flash
66.7
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
52.2
Step 3.5 Flash
78.3
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
43.2
Step 3.5 Flash
60.8
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
34.7
Step 3.5 Flash
87
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
67
Step 3.5 Flash
82.8
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
60.4
Step 3.5 Flash
84.5
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
49.7
Step 3.5 Flash is ahead overall, 66 to 38. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MuSR, where the scores are 82 and 39.
Step 3.5 Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.8 versus 34.7. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Step 3.5 Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 47.1 versus 14.3. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Step 3.5 Flash has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 84.5 versus 49.7. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Step 3.5 Flash has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 78.3 versus 43.2. Inside this category, MuSR is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Step 3.5 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.2 versus 33.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Step 3.5 Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.7 versus 52.2. Inside this category, OfficeQA Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Step 3.5 Flash has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 67. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Step 3.5 Flash has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.8 versus 60.4. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.