Seed 1.6 Flash vs Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Seed 1.6 Flash is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 56 to 42. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Seed 1.6 Flash's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 73.1 against 42.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 74 to 38.

Seed 1.6 Flash gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).

Quick Verdict

Pick Seed 1.6 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Agentic

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

54.5

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

45.9

52
Terminal-Bench 2.0
47
62
BrowseComp
48
52
OSWorld-Verified
43

Coding

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

27.6

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

22.8

59
HumanEval
32
24
SWE-bench Verified
16
25
LiveCodeBench
18
31
SWE-bench Pro
29

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

73.1

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

42.1

74
MMMU-Pro
38
72
OfficeQA Pro
47

Reasoning

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

66.8

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

49

61
SimpleQA
38
59
MuSR
36
75
BBH
63
70
LongBench v2
58
74
MRCRv2
58

Knowledge

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

47.3

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

34.1

65
MMLU
40
64
GPQA
39
62
SuperGPQA
37
60
OpenBookQA
35
65
MMLU-Pro
51
3
HLE
6
57
FrontierScience
42

Instruction Following

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

81

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

68

81
IFEval
68

Multilingual

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

72.8

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

58.8

76
MGSM
62
71
MMLU-ProX
57

Mathematics

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

67.1

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

48.5

64
AIME 2023
40
66
AIME 2024
42
65
AIME 2025
41
60
HMMT Feb 2023
36
62
HMMT Feb 2024
38
61
HMMT Feb 2025
37
63
BRUMO 2025
39
72
MATH-500
60

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 Flash is ahead overall, 56 to 42. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 74 and 38.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 47.3 versus 34.1. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 27.6 versus 22.8. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 67.1 versus 48.5. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 66.8 versus 49. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.5 versus 45.9. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 42.1. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 81 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 72.8 versus 58.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.