Seed 1.6 Flash vs Qwen3 235B 2507

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Seed 1.6 Flash is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 56 to 37. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Seed 1.6 Flash's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 73.1 against 41.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 74 to 38.

Seed 1.6 Flash is the reasoning model in the pair, while Qwen3 235B 2507 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Seed 1.6 Flash gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Qwen3 235B 2507.

Quick Verdict

Pick Seed 1.6 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3 235B 2507 only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Agentic

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

54.5

Qwen3 235B 2507

33.7

52
Terminal-Bench 2.0
33
62
BrowseComp
40
52
OSWorld-Verified
30

Coding

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

27.6

Qwen3 235B 2507

14.6

59
HumanEval
31
24
SWE-bench Verified
15
25
LiveCodeBench
10
31
SWE-bench Pro
19

Multimodal & Grounded

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

73.1

Qwen3 235B 2507

41.6

74
MMMU-Pro
38
72
OfficeQA Pro
46

Reasoning

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

66.8

Qwen3 235B 2507

45.6

61
SimpleQA
37
59
MuSR
35
75
BBH
60
70
LongBench v2
52
74
MRCRv2
52

Knowledge

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

47.3

Qwen3 235B 2507

31.9

65
MMLU
39
64
GPQA
38
62
SuperGPQA
36
60
OpenBookQA
34
65
MMLU-Pro
51
3
HLE
1
57
FrontierScience
39

Instruction Following

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

81

Qwen3 235B 2507

69

81
IFEval
69

Multilingual

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

72.8

Qwen3 235B 2507

60.4

76
MGSM
63
71
MMLU-ProX
59

Mathematics

Seed 1.6 Flash

Seed 1.6 Flash

67.1

Qwen3 235B 2507

46.6

64
AIME 2023
39
66
AIME 2024
41
65
AIME 2025
40
60
HMMT Feb 2023
35
62
HMMT Feb 2024
37
61
HMMT Feb 2025
36
63
BRUMO 2025
38
72
MATH-500
57

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Seed 1.6 Flash is ahead overall, 56 to 37. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 74 and 38.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 47.3 versus 31.9. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 27.6 versus 14.6. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 67.1 versus 46.6. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 66.8 versus 45.6. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.5 versus 33.7. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 41.6. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 81 versus 69. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 235B 2507?

Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 72.8 versus 60.4. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.