Model comparison
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Trinity-Large-Preview
Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B #72 (Supported); Trinity-Large-Preview #79 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Trinity-Large-Preview share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 17 results are unique to Qwen3.5-35B-A3B; 7 to Trinity-Large-Preview.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 11
- Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only
- 17
- Trinity-Large-Preview only
- 7
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Trinity-Large-Preview is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Trinity-Large-Preview is priced at $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B. Trinity-Large-Preview has the larger context window at 512K, compared with 262K for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Δ | Trinity-Large-Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B51.0 | MarginNo overlap | Trinity-Large-PreviewNot measured |
| Coding | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B60.6 | MarginNo overlap | Trinity-Large-PreviewNot measured |
| Reasoning | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B59.0 | MarginNo overlap | Trinity-Large-PreviewNot measured |
| Knowledge | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B81.6 | MarginNo overlap | Trinity-Large-PreviewNot measured |
| Multilingual | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B81.0 | MarginNo overlap | Trinity-Large-PreviewNot measured |
| Inst. Following | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B91.9 | MarginNo overlap | Trinity-Large-PreviewNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Trinity-Large-Preview | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0 input / $0 output | Trinity-Large-Preview$0.25 input / $1 output | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Qwen3.5-35B-A3BNot available | Trinity-Large-PreviewNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Qwen3.5-35B-A3BNot available | Trinity-Large-PreviewNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B262K | Trinity-Large-Preview512K | Trinity-Large-Preview lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Trinity-Large-Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 40.5% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 61% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 54.5% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 89.2% | 90.1% | Trinity-Large-Preview leads |
| Gert LabsSource | 28.96% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 2.7% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 554 | Not comparable |
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Trinity-Large-Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | 85.3% | — | Not comparable |
| SuperGPQASource | 63.4% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | 84.2% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 29.3% | 24.5% | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 84.5% | 75.2% | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads |
| AA-HLESource | 19.7% | 14.7% | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -46.4% | -44.2% | Trinity-Large-Preview leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 20.5% | 22.8% | Trinity-Large-Preview leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 84.0% | 86.6% | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads |
| MMLUSource | — | 87.2% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source | — | 75.2% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 63.3% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Trinity-Large-Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME25 (Arcee)Source | — | 24.0% | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Trinity-Large-Preview | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | 81% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal6 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Trinity-Large-Preview on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Trinity-Large-Preview today?
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Trinity-Large-Preview: $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.