Skip to main content

Qwen3.6-27B vs Sakana Fugu Ultra

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Qwen3.6-27B

71

VS

Sakana Fugu Ultra

100

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Qwen3.6-27B #21 · Sakana Fugu Ultra unranked

Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-27B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Sakana Fugu Ultra
59.3vs82.1

+22.8 difference

Coding

Sakana Fugu Ultra
70.6vs83.5

+12.9 difference

Knowledge

Sakana Fugu Ultra
62.2vs95.5

+33.3 difference

Operational Comparison

Qwen3.6-27B

Sakana Fugu Ultra

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$5 / $30

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

262K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-27B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Sakana Fugu Ultra is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 100 to 71. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Sakana Fugu Ultra's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 95.5 against 62.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 59.3% to 82.1%.

Sakana Fugu Ultra is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.6-27B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Sakana Fugu Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.6-27B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Qwen3.6-27B or Sakana Fugu Ultra?

Sakana Fugu Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 100 to 71. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 59.3% and 82.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Qwen3.6-27B or Sakana Fugu Ultra?

Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 95.5 versus 62.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.6-27B or Sakana Fugu Ultra?

Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 83.5 versus 70.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Qwen3.6-27B or Sakana Fugu Ultra?

Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.1 versus 59.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Qwen3.6-27B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Sakana Fugu Ultra
API / mo$26,250
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 29, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.