Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Qwen3.7 Plus
85
Sakana Fugu Ultra
100
Verified leaderboard positions: Qwen3.7 Plus #4 · Sakana Fugu Ultra unranked
Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.7 Plus only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+10.4 difference
Coding
+12.4 difference
Knowledge
+27.6 difference
Qwen3.7 Plus
Sakana Fugu Ultra
N/A
$5 / $30
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.7 Plus only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Sakana Fugu Ultra is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 100 to 85. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Sakana Fugu Ultra's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 95.5 against 67.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 57.6% to 73.7%.
Sakana Fugu Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 100 to 85. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 57.6% and 73.7%.
Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 95.5 versus 67.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 83.5 versus 71.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.1 versus 71.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.