Agentic
Not comparable- Qwen3.8-27B
- 63.4
- Supported · #13/152
- ZAYA1-VL-8B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 8 vs 0 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-VL-8B
Updated September 10, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
Decision reading
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
1 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Share or export
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Qwen3.8-27B
Qwen3.8-27B has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
ZAYA1-VL-8B is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
ZAYA1-VL-8B is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.
Confidence: limited
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
The page does not recommend a cost winner because at least one model cannot fit the stated workload in one request. ZAYA1-VL-8B does not fit this workload in one request. Qwen3.8-27B has no comparable published API token rate. ZAYA1-VL-8B has no comparable published API token rate.
Confidence: listed-rates
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
32 Qwen3.8-27B only
1 Shared
4 ZAYA1-VL-8B only
- Shared results
- 1
- Qwen3.8-27B only
- 32
- ZAYA1-VL-8B only
- 4
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
Coding
Not comparable- Qwen3.8-27B
- 53.9
- Supported · #43/151
- ZAYA1-VL-8B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 8 vs 0 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Qwen3.8-27B
- 77.4
- #7/20
- ZAYA1-VL-8B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- Qwen3.8-27B
- 54.1
- Supported · #58/183
- ZAYA1-VL-8B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 6 vs 0 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Qwen3.8-27B
- Not ranked
- ZAYA1-VL-8B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Qwen3.8-27B
- Not ranked
- ZAYA1-VL-8B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Qwen3.8-27B
- 80.0
- #11/48
- ZAYA1-VL-8B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 1 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Qwen3.8-27B
- 84.7
- #45/123
- ZAYA1-VL-8B
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 1 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Qwen3.8-27B | ZAYA1-VL-8B | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 63.4Supported · #13/152 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 8 vs 0 public rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | 53.9Supported · #43/151 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 8 vs 0 public rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | 77.4#7/20 | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | 54.1Supported · #58/183 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 6 vs 0 public rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | 80.0#11/48 | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 1 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | 84.7#45/123 | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 1 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
A shared-evidence shape is not available.
BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Qwen3.8-27B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- ZAYA1-VL-8B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Qwen3.8-27B has no comparable published API token rate. ZAYA1-VL-8B has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Qwen3.8-27B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- ZAYA1-VL-8B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Qwen3.8-27B has no comparable published API token rate. ZAYA1-VL-8B has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Qwen3.8-27B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
- ZAYA1-VL-8B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Does not fit in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
ZAYA1-VL-8B does not fit this workload in one request. Qwen3.8-27B has no comparable published API token rate. ZAYA1-VL-8B has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationQwen3.8-27BZAYA1-VL-8B
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Qwen3.8-27B
ZAYA1-VL-8B
API model ID
Qwen3.8-27B
Not sourced
ZAYA1-VL-8B
Zyphra/ZAYA1-VL-8B
Zyphra ZAYA1-VL-8B model cardCached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Qwen3.8-27B
No comparable hosted API rate
Qwen3.8-27B model cardZAYA1-VL-8B
No comparable hosted API rate
Zyphra ZAYA1-VL-8B model cardDocumented inputs
Qwen3.8-27B
Not sourced
ZAYA1-VL-8B
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Qwen3.8-27B
Not sourced
ZAYA1-VL-8B
Not sourced
Provider availability
Qwen3.8-27B
Not sourced
ZAYA1-VL-8B
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Qwen3.8-27B
Reasoning
ZAYA1-VL-8B
Non-Reasoning
Weight access
Qwen3.8-27B
Open Weight
ZAYA1-VL-8B
Open Weight
License
Qwen3.8-27B
Open Weight
ZAYA1-VL-8B
Open Weight
Release date
Qwen3.8-27B
2026-08-05
ZAYA1-VL-8B
2026-05-08
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Qwen3.8-27B has the larger documented window (262K).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence37 rows
Agentic
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Qwen3.8-27B73.0%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
CoWorkBench
Qwen3.8-27B70.7%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
JobBench
Qwen3.8-27B33.4%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
Agents' Last Exam
Qwen3.8-27B42.9%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
OSWorld-Verified
Qwen3.8-27B84.3%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
WebArena-Verified
Qwen3.8-27B64.8%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
AndroidWorld
Qwen3.8-27B81.9%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)
Qwen3.8-27B58.4%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
Coding
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Qwen3.8-27B73.0%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
SWE-bench Pro
Qwen3.8-27B61.7%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
NL2Repo
Qwen3.8-27B42.3%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
DeepSWE
Qwen3.8-27B42.2%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
LiveCodeBench v6
Qwen3.8-27B90.3%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
VulcanBench v3
Qwen3.8-27B82.6%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
LiveCodeBench (Vals)
Qwen3.8-27B84.0%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
SWE-bench (Vals)
Qwen3.8-27B86.0%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
Knowledge
GPQA
Qwen3.8-27B89.2%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
GPQA-D
Qwen3.8-27B89.2%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
HLE
Qwen3.8-27B30.8%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
HLE w/o tools
Qwen3.8-27B30.8%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
GPQA Diamond (Vals)
Qwen3.8-27B88.9%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
MMLU-Pro (Vals)
Qwen3.8-27B84.3%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
Multimodal
MathVision
Qwen3.8-27B90.0%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
MathVision w/ Python
Qwen3.8-27B94.6%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
BabyVision
Qwen3.8-27B65.7%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
BabyVision w/ Python
Qwen3.8-27B85.6%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
Vision2Web
Qwen3.8-27B62.9%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
CharXiv w/o tools
Qwen3.8-27B83.7%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
CharXiv
Qwen3.8-27B90.2%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5
Qwen3.8-27B91.1%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
RealWorldQA
Qwen3.8-27B85.9%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B65.0%SourceQwen3.8-27B leads this result
ERQA
Qwen3.8-27B65.5%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
AI2D_TEST
Qwen3.8-27B—ZAYA1-VL-8B87.5%SourceNot directly comparable
MMMU
Qwen3.8-27B—ZAYA1-VL-8B46.0%SourceNot directly comparable
CountBench
Qwen3.8-27B—ZAYA1-VL-8B88.1%SourceNot directly comparable
RefCOCO (avg)
Qwen3.8-27B—ZAYA1-VL-8B84.3%SourceNot directly comparable
Instruction following
IFBench
Qwen3.8-27B79.5%SourceZAYA1-VL-8B—Not directly comparable
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Qwen3.8-27B or ZAYA1-VL-8B?
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Qwen3.8-27B or ZAYA1-VL-8B?
ZAYA1-VL-8B is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Qwen3.8-27B or ZAYA1-VL-8B?
ZAYA1-VL-8B is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.
Which costs less, Qwen3.8-27B or ZAYA1-VL-8B?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Qwen3.8-27B or ZAYA1-VL-8B?
Qwen3.8-27B has the larger documented context window: 262K, compared with 131K.
Related comparisons
Last updated September 10, 2026
Watch Qwen3.8-27B vs ZAYA1-VL-8B
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.